The History of the Crusades (vol. 2 of 3)Michaud, J. Fr. (Joseph Fr.)
History
The History of the Crusades (vol. 2 of 3)
Michaud, J. Fr. (Joseph Fr.)
Crusades
Melik-Kamel caused the sluices to be closed, and the waters rapidly
retired from the plain; as soon as Damietta was surrendered to the
Mussulmans, the Christian army began its retreat. The Crusaders, who
owed their liberty and lives to the mercy of the Saracens, passed
through the city which had cost them so many conflicts and so much
labour; and, weeping, quitted the banks of the Nile, where so short a
time before they had sworn to make the cause of Christ triumphant. They
bore away in sadness the wood of the true cross, the identity of which
they had reason to suspect, since it no longer performed miracles, and
was not for them now the signal of victory. The sultan of Egypt caused
them to be accompanied by his son, who had orders to provide for all
their wants on their route. The Saracen leaders were impatient to get
rid of an army that had threatened their empire; they could scarcely
give credit to their own triumph, and some little apprehension was,
no doubt, mingled with the pity with which their conquered enemies
inspired them.
Great rejoicings had been made at Ptolemaïs for the victories obtained
by the Christians on the banks of the Nile; they believed that they
already saw the holy places delivered, and the empire of the Saracens
destroyed. Consternation took place of their joy on seeing the army
return. As in all the other reverses which their arms had met with,
the Christians mutually reproached each other with their defeat; they
accused the leaders of ambition, and the king of Jerusalem of weakness;
the Templars and Hospitallers, who had on all occasions set an example
of courage and the most generous devotedness, were obliged to make a
public apology for their conduct. When it became known in the West
that Damietta had fallen again into the hands of the Saracens, all the
faithful were affected by the deepest grief,[231] and sought, by their
prayers, to mitigate the anger of Heaven. Violent murmurs arose against
the legate Pelagius, and represented him to the sovereign pontiff as
the author of all the disasters of the crusade; but Honorius was not
willing to condemn his minister, and reproached Frederick, who had
three times renewed his vow to fight against the infidels, with having
remained an idle spectator of an unfortunate war, and with having
neglected to succour his brethren of the East.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account