The History of the Crusades (vol. 2 of 3)Michaud, J. Fr. (Joseph Fr.)
History
The History of the Crusades (vol. 2 of 3)
Michaud, J. Fr. (Joseph Fr.)
Crusades
At the period of which we have just retraced the history, so many
crusades were preached at once, that the eyes of the faithful were
necessarily diverted from the first object of these holy expeditions.
Called upon to defend so many causes, no one could distinguish which
was the cause of God and Jesus Christ; so many interests presented
themselves at the same time to the attention of Christians, and were
recommended to the bravery of warriors, that they gave birth to
hesitation and reflection; and these produced indifference. Europe,
for a length of time in a state of fermentation, was undergoing the
vague uncertainty of a change; states began to think more of their
independence, people of their liberty. The passions which politics
bring forth, took the place of passions of which religion is the motive.
The sanguinary quarrels of the emperor and the popes contributed
greatly to the revolution which was brought about in men’s minds:
the motive which animated the heads of the Church was not always a
religious one; the emperor of Germany and the pontiffs of Rome had
pretensions to the domination of Italy, and had been, for a long time,
engaged in a rivalry of ambition. Gregory could not see Frederick
master of the kingdom of Naples without great pain; and when he pressed
him to go into Asia, to make war upon the Saracens, he might have been
compared to that personage of ancient fable, who, in order to get rid
of his rival, sent him to combat the Chimera.
Four popes, although of a different character, finding themselves in
the same circumstances, pursued the same policy. Frederick, by his
cruelties, injustice, and extravagant ambition, often justified the
violences of the Holy See, of which he was, by turns, the ward, the
protector, and the enemy; like his predecessors, he made no secret of
his project of restoring the empire of the Cæsars; and, had it not been
for the popes, it is not improbable that Europe would have been brought
under the yoke of the emperors of Germany.
The policy of the sovereign pontiffs, whilst weakening the imperial
power, favoured, in Germany, the liberty of cities, and the growth
and duration of small states; we do not hesitate to add, that the
thunders of the Church preserved the independence of Italy, and
perhaps that of France, which was less ill treated by the court of
Rome than neighbouring nations. The French monarchy took advantage of
the troubles that existed on the other side of the Rhine, and of the
interdict set upon England, to repel the invasions of the English and
Germans; and, at the same time, availed itself of the absence of the
king of Navarre, the dukes of Brittany and Burgundy, with several other
great vassals, whom the crusade attracted beyond the seas, to increase
the prerogatives of the royal authority, and extend the limits of the
kingdom.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account