The History of the Crusades (vol. 2 of 3)Michaud, J. Fr. (Joseph Fr.)
History
The History of the Crusades (vol. 2 of 3)
Michaud, J. Fr. (Joseph Fr.)
Crusades
England herself owes something to the authority of the popes, who,
by overwhelming John Lackland with excommunications, rendered him
powerless in his attempts to enslave the English people, or to resist
the demands of the barons and the commons. This is a truth which
impartial history cannot deny or doubt, and which disposes us not to
approve, but to blame with less bitterness, excesses and abuses of
power of which all the effects have not been deplorable.[253] The
populace of London, who burn every year the effigy of the pope, would
be much astonished if, amidst a fanatical delirium, they were told that
the army which once fought for the independence of Great Britain was
called _the army of God and of the Holy Church_; if they were reminded
that the great charter of the Forest, the first monument of British
liberty, was the fortunate fruit of the menaces and thunders of the
Church of Rome, and that this charter would never have been granted by
John, without the redoubtable influence and the imperious counsels of
the sovereign pontiff.[254]
Without wishing to justify the domination of the popes, we may say
that they were led to grasp at supreme power by the circumstances in
which Europe was placed in the eleventh and twelfth centuries. European
society, without experience or laws, and plunged in ignorance and
anarchy, cast itself into the arms of the popes, and believed that it
placed itself under the protection of Heaven.
As nations had no other ideas of civilization than such as they
received from the Christian religion, the sovereign pontiffs naturally
became the supreme arbiters between rival or neighbouring countries;
amidst the darkness which the light of the Gospel had a continued and
never-ending tendency to diminish, their authority must naturally
have been the first established and the first recognised; temporal
power stood in need of their sanction; people and kings implored their
support and consulted their wisdom: they believed themselves authorized
to exercise a sovereign dictatorship.
This dictatorship was often exercised to the advantage of public
morality and social order; it often protected the weak against the
strong; it arrested the execution of criminal plots; it re-established
peace between states; and it preserved a young society from the
excesses of ambition, licentiousness, and barbarism. When we cast
our eyes over the annals of the middle ages, we cannot help being
struck by one of the most beautiful spectacles that human society
has ever presented,—it is that of Christian Europe recognising but
one religion, having but one law, forming as it were but one empire,
governed by a single head, who spoke in the name of God, and whose
mission was to make the Gospel reign upon earth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account