The History of the Crusades (vol. 2 of 3)Michaud, J. Fr. (Joseph Fr.)
History
The History of the Crusades (vol. 2 of 3)
Michaud, J. Fr. (Joseph Fr.)
Crusades
The Greeks, in a single battle, had lost the empire of the sea, and
had no longer the power to defend the approach to their capital. The
Venetian fleet cast anchor near the mouth of the river Barbysses.[101]
The Venetians, masters of the port, were secure from all surprise,
and had no cause to fear being overpowered by numbers. If the whole
army had been united on board the fleet, there is very little doubt it
would have more easily triumphed over the efforts and multitudes of
the Greeks, and it was the advice of the doge that such should be the
plan; but the knights and barons could not be prevailed upon to fight
on an element with which they were unacquainted; and they answered (we
quote Villehardouin), that they could not act so well upon the sea as
they could upon the land, where they could have their horses and their
arms. Their army, which did not muster twenty thousand men under its
banners, attacked without fear a city, which, according to the account
of some historians, contained a million of inhabitants, and more than
two hundred thousand men able to bear arms.
Before they began the assault, the Crusaders deemed it proper once more
to invite the Greeks to make peace, by receiving the son of Isaac as
emperor; and several barons drew near to the walls, crying with a loud
voice that there was still time to listen to justice. Young Alexius was
surrounded by the Latin leaders, and his presence among them explained
sufficiently clearly the meaning of the words addressed to the
inhabitants of Constantinople. Their only reply was hurling stones and
javelins at the Crusaders; the people of Byzantium had been persuaded
that young Alexius came for the purpose of changing the manners,
religion, and laws of Greece.
History ought to add here, that since the intrigues of ambition and the
caprices of fortune had enjoyed the privilege of bestowing masters upon
them, the Greeks beheld with indifference the successions of power or
the changes of their princes; the Greek nations had not forgotten that
it was a revolution that lifted the family of Isaac to the imperial
throne. With the impressions this family had left in their minds, the
misfortunes and prayers of Alexius did not move them sufficiently to
declare in his favour, or take arms to support his cause; since they
were obliged to choose between two new princes, he who was reigning
amongst them appeared preferable to him who implored their aid.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account