The history of the damnable life and deserved death of Doctor John Faustus, 1592, together with The second report of Faustus, containing his appearances and the deeds of Wagner, 1594. — John Shaqi
The history of the damnable life and deserved death of Doctor John Faustus, 1592, together with The second report of Faustus, containing his appearances and the deeds of Wagner, 1594.
History
The history of the damnable life and deserved death of Doctor John Faustus, 1592, together with The second report of Faustus, containing his appearances and the deeds of Wagner, 1594.
Faust, -approximately 1540 -- Legends
in Rome, but whereas Luther had set out with feelings of reverence,
only to return in disappointment and indignation, Faust was merely
amused and contemplated with cynical complacency the license of the
Vatican, where the priests were no better than himself. Luther married
in accordance with the tenets of the Church, but Faust rejected the
sacrament of marriage for the pagan Helena. Luther based his faith on
the Bible, Faust was not content to accept the Holy Writ, but sought to
penetrate the forbidden mysteries beyond it. Faust entered into league
with the Devil, while Luther hurled his inkstand at him.[6]
It is true that it was not in the spirit of Luther to conceive of
the defection from orthodox theology as defection from God, and the
ridicule to which the Church of Rome and its priests are exposed in
the Faust book, even the Devil himself appearing in the guise of a
monk, would quite possibly even have appealed to his robust sense of
humour. Nevertheless, there seems little reason to doubt that the book
was written from the Lutheran standpoint. Since, however, in the field
of German literary research, it seems impossible for any definite
point of view, with whatever weight of proof it may be supported,
to be maintained for very long, before a scholar brings forward its
exact opposite, which he defends with equally weighty evidence, there
has recently been an attempt to prove that the tendency of the Faust
book was not Lutheran but Catholic.[7] The author of this theory does
not deny that the intention of some passages is obviously hostile
to Catholicism, but he declares that they are later interpolations,
and endeavours to prove that the book is a parody on Luther, who is
represented as a modern Bacchus and companion of the Devil. The first
direct anti-clerical reference is the taunt at the celibacy of the
clergy in Faust’s conversation with Mephostophiles concerning the
former’s desire to take a wife. The Devil endeavours to dissuade him
by declaring that marriage is a divine institution, but Faust retorts
that the monks and nuns do not marry. This passage is lacking in the
Wolfenbüttel MS. In the chapter which deals with the journey through
Europe, Faust remarks at Cologne that the Devil is in the Church of
St. Ursula with the 11,000 virgins. The MS. has _Tempel_ instead of
_Teufel_. When Faust arrives in Rome, he spends three days and nights
invisible in the pope’s palace, finding that “these pigs at Rome are
fattened and all ready to roast and cook,” and after his experience in
the harem at Constantinople, he mounts up in the air in the vestments
of a pope. These last two adventures are also to be found in the
MS., but Dr. Wolff declares them to be interpolations. His evidence,
however, is not convincing, and there is little reason to assume that
the spirit of any literary version of the Faust book which may have
been extant before 1587 was different from the tendency of the edition
published by Spies.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account