The History of the Manners and Customs of Ancient Greece, Volume 2 (of 3) — John Shaqi
The History of the Manners and Customs of Ancient Greece, Volume 2 (of 3)St. John, James Augustus
History
The History of the Manners and Customs of Ancient Greece, Volume 2 (of 3)
St. John, James Augustus
Greece -- Social life and customs
Of the impediments to marriage arising, among ancient nations, from
relationship or consanguinity, very little is with certainty known. In
the heroic ages, all unions excepting those of parents with their
children appear to have been lawful; for, in the Odyssey, we find the
six sons of Æolos joined in marriage with their six sisters, the manners
of the olden times, abandoned on earth, still lingering among the gods.
Iphidamos has to wife his mother’s sister,[9] and Alcinoös, by no means
a profligate or immoral prince, is united with his brother’s
daughter;[10] Deiphobos, after Paris’s death, takes possession of
Helen,[11] and Helenos, the seer, is united in wedlock with Andromache,
the widow of his brother Hector.[12] But without alleging any further
examples, we may, from the practice imputed to the gods, among whom
scarcely any degree of relationship was a bar to marriage, infer that,
in very early ages, few scruples were entertained upon the subject.
Later mythologists have even imputed to Zeus an illicit amour with his
daughter Aphrodite,[13] but libellously, and in contradiction to the
best ancient authorities.[14] Nature, indeed, has so peremptorily
prohibited the union of parents with their own children, that positive
laws forbidding connexions so nefarious, have in all ages been nearly
unnecessary, though the superstition of the Magi[15] in ancient, and the
profligacy of popes and princes in modern times, have been accused of
transgressing these natural boundaries.
-----
Footnote 9:
Hom. Il. λ. 221, seq.
Footnote 10:
Hom. Odyss. η. 55, seq.
Footnote 11:
Keightley, Mythology, p. 490.
Footnote 12:
Serv. ad Virg. Æn. iii. 297.
Footnote 13:
Virg. Cir. 133.
Sed malus ille puer, quem nec sua flectere mater,
Iratum potuit, quem nec pater, atque avus idem
Jupiter.
Footnote 14:
For Valckernaer’s correction of Eurip. Hippol. 536, where for ὁ Δίος
παῖς, he reads ὄλιγος παῖς, should, I think, be adopted. Diatrib. in
Eurip. Perd. Dram. xv. p. 159, c. His whole defence of Zeus on this
_count_ is triumphant. Still the notes of Monk, Beck, Musgrave, and
the Classical Journal, vi. 80, should be compared.
Footnote 15:
Diog. Laert. Proœm. § 6. To this practice Euripides probably alludes
in the Andromache, v. 173, sqq., where Hermione describes, with scorn,
the profligate manners of the barbarians. Catullus, inveighing against
the impious depravity of a contemporary, observes—
“Nam Magus ex matre et gnato gignatur oportet,
Si vera est Persarum _impia religio_.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account