The History of the Manners and Customs of Ancient Greece, Volume 3 (of 3) — John Shaqi
The History of the Manners and Customs of Ancient Greece, Volume 3 (of 3)St. John, James Augustus
History
The History of the Manners and Customs of Ancient Greece, Volume 3 (of 3)
St. John, James Augustus
Greece -- Social life and customs
When the words in the text were written Mr. Müller was still living,
and there was every reason to expect from him a series of learned and
able works on the history and antiquities of Greece. He has since,
however, fallen a victim to the persevering ardour with which he
pursued his researches into the topography of that illustrious land;
and in common, I believe, with every other admirer of the Hellenic
people and literature I sincerely lament his premature death. My
regret moreover is heightened by the knowledge that Mr. Muller had
projected a history of Greece which his profound investigations and
extensive knowledge of the country would unquestionably have rendered
highly valuable. His ashes repose among those of the most
distinguished men of antiquity. He caught his death among the ruins of
Delphi, and was buried at Athens.
-----
As, however, he has adopted a very peculiar system in the interpretation
of antiquity, which, though plausible and ingenious, seems
ill-calculated to lead to truth, I have found it impossible to
participate on many important points the views which he maintains, more
especially on the subject of the Helots. In fact, with all his talents
and sagacity he has chosen rather to become an advocate than an
historian, and pushes so far his eagerness to defend his favourite
people, as not unfrequently to provoke a smile. In his derivation of the
term Helot, however, he is perhaps correct,[158] it being more probable
that it should have sprung from an ancient word signifying “The
Prisoners” than from the name of the town. In the absence of all
testimony we might likewise entertain the conjecture, “that they were an
aboriginal race subdued at a very early period, and which immediately
passed over as slaves to the Doric conquerors.” But we have the weighty
authority of Theopompos to oppose to this inference, and the words of
this historian[159] attentively considered would lead to the etymology
of the name given by Müller:—“having taken them prisoners,” he says,
“they called them εἵλωτες.” They were, however, Greeks of the Achaian
race, who fell, together with the land, into the power of the
new-comers, so that the excuse of only tyrannising over a foreign and
half-savage race is wanting to the Spartans, which was the object aimed
at by Mr. Müller’s ingenious conjecture.
-----
Footnote 158:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account