Greece -- History -- Peloponnesian War, 431-404 B.C.
So bloody was the march of the revolution, and the impression which it
made was the greater as it was one of the first to occur. Later on, one
may say, the whole Hellenic world was convulsed; struggles being every,
where made by the popular chiefs to bring in the Athenians, and by the
oligarchs to introduce the Lacedaemonians. In peace there would have
been neither the pretext nor the wish to make such an invitation; but
in war, with an alliance always at the command of either faction for
the hurt of their adversaries and their own corresponding advantage,
opportunities for bringing in the foreigner were never wanting to the
revolutionary parties. The sufferings which revolution entailed upon
the cities were many and terrible, such as have occurred and always
will occur, as long as the nature of mankind remains the same; though
in a severer or milder form, and varying in their symptoms, according
to the variety of the particular cases. In peace and prosperity, states
and individuals have better sentiments, because they do not find
themselves suddenly confronted with imperious necessities; but war
takes away the easy supply of daily wants, and so proves a rough
master, that brings most men’s characters to a level with their
fortunes. Revolution thus ran its course from city to city, and the
places which it arrived at last, from having heard what had been done
before, carried to a still greater excess the refinement of their
inventions, as manifested in the cunning of their enterprises and the
atrocity of their reprisals. Words had to change their ordinary meaning
and to take that which was now given them. Reckless audacity came to be
considered the courage of a loyal ally; prudent hesitation, specious
cowardice; moderation was held to be a cloak for unmanliness; ability
to see all sides of a question, inaptness to act on any. Frantic
violence became the attribute of manliness; cautious plotting, a
justifiable means of self-defence. The advocate of extreme measures was
always trustworthy; his opponent a man to be suspected. To succeed in a
plot was to have a shrewd head, to divine a plot a still shrewder; but
to try to provide against having to do either was to break up your
party and to be afraid of your adversaries. In fine, to forestall an
intending criminal, or to suggest the idea of a crime where it was
wanting, was equally commended until even blood became a weaker tie
than party, from the superior readiness of those united by the latter
to dare everything without reserve; for such associations had not in
view the blessings derivable from established institutions but were
formed by ambition for their overthrow; and the confidence of their
members in each other rested less on any religious sanction than upon
complicity in crime. The fair proposals of an adversary were met with
jealous precautions by the stronger of the two, and not with a generous
confidence. Revenge also was held of more account than
self-preservation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account