The History of the Popes: From the Foundation of the See of Rome, to the Present Time, 3rd Ed. Vol. 1Bower, Archibald
History
The History of the Popes: From the Foundation of the See of Rome, to the Present Time, 3rd Ed. Vol. 1
Bower, Archibald
Catholic Church -- History; Papacy -- History; Popes -- Biography
tho’ they both lived at that very time in Exile, having been driven from
their Sees by the _Arians_, on account of the Zeal, which they had, with
an invincible Firmness, exerted in Defence of the Orthodox Faith[1051].
The Bishop of _Rome_ might, with very little Trouble, have been better
informed; but his Mind, it seems, was so deeply engaged in worldly
Affairs, and his Thoughts so taken up with State, Pomp, and Grandeur,
that he was never at Leisure to mind those Matters, which justly
claimed, and ought to have engrossed, his whole Attention. By him the
Western Bishops were led into the same Mistake concerning _Eusebius_ and
_Meletius_; and hence the Backwardness they shewed to correspond with
_Basil_, as if he designed to impose upon them, or was himself imposed
upon by others. [Sidenote: _St._ Basil _complains of_ Damasus, _and
the Western Bishops_.] Of this _Basil_ justly complained in a Letter he
writ to _Eusebius_ of _Samosata_. _If the Wrath of God_, says he, _is in
the End appeased, if Mercy takes place, what other Help do we stand in
need of? But, if his Anger continues, what Relief will the Pride of the
West afford us? They neither know the Truth, nor can they patiently bear
it. They are ever prepossessed with idle Jealousies, ever swayed by
groundless Surmises; and therefore act now the same Part they lately
acted in the Case of_ Marcellinus; _that is, they quarrel with those,
who inform them of the Truth, and, being left to themselves, they
introduce and establish Heresies. As for my own Part, I had once some
Thoughts of writing a private Letter to their Chief_ (that is, to
_Damasus_), _and, waving all Mention of Church Affairs, only tell him,
that they_ _neither know what passes here, nor take the right Method to
be informed; and that they ought not to oppress those who are already
humbled by Affliction, nor mistake Pride for Dignity, since that Sin
alone is capable of Setting a Man at Enmity with God_[1052]. From these
Words it is pretty plain, that the Notion of the Pope’s Infallibility
was not yet broached, or at least was not yet known to _Basil_. The
Bishop of the Metropolis of the Empire was deservedly looked upon, in
regard of the Dignity of his See, as the Chief and Head of all the
Western Bishops; and to him as such, not as an infallible and unerring
Judge, the Eastern Bishops frequently applied in the Disputes, that
happened to rise among them; so that all we can infer from their
applying to him is, that his Authority bore a great Sway; which was
owing to the Pre-eminence of his See, and not to any Power or
Prerogative peculiar to him, and superior to others.
[Sidenote: Damasus _takes on him the Office of Judge, being only
chosen Mediator_.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account