The History of the Popes: From the Foundation of the See of Rome, to the Present Time, 3rd Ed. Vol. 1Bower, Archibald
History
The History of the Popes: From the Foundation of the See of Rome, to the Present Time, 3rd Ed. Vol. 1
Bower, Archibald
Catholic Church -- History; Papacy -- History; Popes -- Biography
It was long ere _Damasus_ could be brought to give any Attention to the
Affairs of the East; and when he did, it was only to add Fewel to the
Fire, which had lately begun to rage with great Violence. For, looking
upon the Office of a bare Mediator, which alone had been offered him, as
no-ways suitable to his Dignity, he arrogantly assumed that of a Judge,
and not only acknowleged _Paulinus_ for lawful Bishop of _Antioch_, but,
misled by false and groundless Reports, declared _Meletius_ a
Transgressor of the Canons, an Intruder, a Schismatic, and even an
Heretic[1053]; that _Meletius_, who had suffered Exile, and innumerable
Hardships, in Defence of the Orthodox Faith, who was then revered all
over the East, as a Man of extraordinary Sanctity, and is now honoured
by the Church of _Rome_ as a Saint of the first Class. [Sidenote: _His
Conduct condemned by St._ Basil.] But his thus openly declaring in
favour of _Paulinus_, his treating in such a base and unworthy manner
one of the most eminent Prelates in the East, served only to engage the
Followers of _Meletius_ more warmly in his Cause; and the great _Basil_,
among the rest, who could not help censuring the Conduct of _Damasus_ as
rash, partial, and injudicious: he even repented his having ever applied
to him; for, in one of his Letters to _Eusebius_ of _Samosata_, he
expresses himself thus: _The Saying of_ Diomedes _occurs to my Mind_;
Intreaties are not to be used with _Achilles_, he is too haughty[1054];
_and truly the more you flatter haughty and insolent Men, the more
haughty and insolent they become_[1055]. As no Regard was had to the
Authority of _Damasus_, and the Western Bishops, who, following his
Example, acknowleged _Paulinus_, and not _Meletius_, the Orthodox
Bishops in the East not only continued divided among themselves, but a
new Division arose between the Western Bishops, and those of the Party
of _Meletius_, at the Head of which was _Basil_ Bishop of _Cæsarea_.
But, of these unhappy Divisions, so far as the Bishops of _Rome_ were
concerned in them, we shall have Occasion to speak hereafter.
[Sidenote: _New Disturbances raised in_ Rome, _by the Partisans
of_ Ursinus;]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account