The History of the Popes: From the Foundation of the See of Rome, to the Present Time, 3rd Ed. Vol. 1Bower, Archibald
History
The History of the Popes: From the Foundation of the See of Rome, to the Present Time, 3rd Ed. Vol. 1
Bower, Archibald
Catholic Church -- History; Papacy -- History; Popes -- Biography
That this Council was assembled by the Emperor _Theodosius_, is affirmed
by all the Writers who speak of it[1151], nay, and by the Bishops who
composed it[1152]. And yet _Baronius_ has the Assurance to assert, _as a
Thing not to be questioned_, that it was convened by _Damasus_[1153],
which none of the Antients have so much as once named: and this
Assertion he founds upon the Authority of the universally exploded Acts
of _Damasus_; of certain Manuscripts, which he knows very little of, and
nobody else any thing; and of a Passage in the Acts of the Sixth
Oecumenical Council, where it is said, that _Theodosius_ and _Damasus_
opposed with great Firmness the _Macedonian_ Heresy; whence the Annalist
concludes, by what Rules of Logic I leave the Reader to find out, that
the Council, which condemned the Heresy of _Macedonius_, was convened by
the Authority of _Damasus_, backed by that of the Emperor[1154].
_Christianus Lupus_, more honest than _Baronius_, tho’ no less attached
to the See of _Rome_, ingenuously owns, that the Council was assembled
by the Emperor alone; but adds, that _Damasus_ confirmed it[1155]; which
is true, if he means no more than that _Damasus_ accepted the Decrees
made by the Council; for it was not his, but the Emperor’s Approbation,
that gave them a Sanction; and accordingly they writ, not to him, but to
the Emperor, acquainting him; _by whose Command they had been called
together_, with the Decrees they had made, and requesting him to confirm
them _with his Seal and Sentence_[1156]. This Council consisted of an
Hundred and Fifty Bishops, among whom were Thirty-six _Macedonians_,
whom _Theodosius_ had particularly summoned, hoping to reunite them with
the Catholics[1157]. No mention is made of Letters or Deputies sent
either by _Damasus_, or by any of the Western Bishops; and _Theodoret_
assures us in Two different Places[1158], that _Theodosius_ only
assembled the Eastern Bishops. _Meletius_ of _Antioch_ presided; for
_Gregory_ of _Nyssa_ styled him in full Council, _our Father and
Head_[1159]. Upon his Death (for he died while the Council was sitting)
that Honour was conferred on _Gregory Nazianzen_, appointed by the
Emperor and the Council Bishop of _Constantinople_[1160]; but he
resigning, soon after, his new Dignity, his Successor _Nectarius_ was
named to preside in his room[1161].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account