The History of the Popes: From the Foundation of the See of Rome, to the Present Time, 3rd Ed. Vol. 1Bower, Archibald
History
The History of the Popes: From the Foundation of the See of Rome, to the Present Time, 3rd Ed. Vol. 1
Bower, Archibald
Catholic Church -- History; Papacy -- History; Popes -- Biography
_Maximus_, surnamed the _Cynic_, because he had from his Youth professed
the Philosophy, and wore the Habit, of that Sect, was a Man of a most
infamous Character, and had been publicly whipt in _Egypt_, his native
Country, and confined to the City of _Oasis_, for Crimes not to be
mentioned[1175]. Being released from his Banishment, he wandered all
over the East, and was every where equally abhorred and detested on
account of his matchless Impudence and scandalous Manners[1176]. At last
he repaired to _Constantinople_, where he had not been long, when, by
one of the boldest Attempts mentioned in History, he caused himself to
be installed and ordained Bishop of that City: for the Doors of the
Church being broken open in the Dead of the Night, by a Band of
_Egyptian_ Mariners, he was placed on the Episcopal Chair in the profane
Dress of a _Cynic_, by some Bishops whom his Friends had sent out of
_Egypt_ for that Purpose. But the People, and some of the Clergy, in the
adjoining Houses, being alarmed at the Noise, and crouding to see what
occasioned it, _Maximus_ and his unhallowed Crew thought fit to
withdraw, and complete the Ceremony in a Place better adapted to such a
Scene of Profaneness, the House of a Player on the Flute[1177].
_Maximus_, thus ordained, in equal Defiance of the Imperial Laws and
Canons of the Church, had the Assurance to claim the See of
_Constantinople_ as his Right, and to protest against the Election of
_Gregory Nazianzen_, and likewise of _Nectarius_, who was chosen upon
the Resignation of _Gregory_, tho’ they had both been named to that
Dignity by the Council of _Constantinople_, that is, by all the Eastern
Bishops. But no Regard being had to his Protest, nay, his Ordination
being declared null by the Council, and he driven out of the City by the
Populace, and rejected with Indignation by the Emperor, he had recourse
to the Bishops of the Vicariate of _Italy_, then assembled in Council
with _Ambrose_ Bishop of _Milan_ at their Head, as I have observed
above. [Sidenote: _He is acknowleged by_ Ambrose, _and the_ Italian
_Bishops_.] These giving an intire Credit to the Accounts of the lying
and deceitful _Cynic_, as they were quite unacquainted with what had
passed in the East, not only admitted him to their Communion, but,
without farther Inquiry or Examination, acknowleged him for lawful
Bishop of _Constantinople_, and writ the above-mentioned Letter to
_Theodosius_ in his Behalf[1178]. We must not confound this Council with
that of _Aquileia_, as I find most Writers have done: for the latter was
composed of almost all the Western Bishops under _Valerian_ Bishop of
the Place; whereas the Council I am now speaking of, consisted only of
the Bishops of the Vicariate of _Italy_, under the Bishop of _Milan_
their Metropolitan. It is surprising that _Ambrose_, and the other
Bishops of that Council, should not have been better informed with
respect to the Ordination of _Maximus_, since _Acholius_ Bishop of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account