The History of the Popes: From the Foundation of the See of Rome, to the Present Time, 3rd Ed. Vol. 1Bower, Archibald
History
The History of the Popes: From the Foundation of the See of Rome, to the Present Time, 3rd Ed. Vol. 1
Bower, Archibald
Catholic Church -- History; Papacy -- History; Popes -- Biography
_Thessalonica_, with Five other Bishops of _Macedon_, had, at least a
Year before, transmitted to _Damasus_ a minute Account of it, agreeing
in every Particular with that which I have given above from _Gregory
Nazianzen_[1179]. [Sidenote: _The Emperor’s Answer to their Letter._]
The Letter from the Council caused no small Surprize in _Theodosius_: he
was sensible they had suffered themselves to be grosly imposed upon;
but, not judging it necessary to undeceive them, he only told them, in
his Answer to their Letter, that the Reasons they alleged did not seem
sufficient to him for assembling an Oecumenical Council, and giving so
much Trouble to the Prelates of the Church; that they were not to
concern themselves with what happened in the East, nor remove the
Bounds, that had been wisely placed by their Fore-fathers between the
East and the West; and that, as to the Affair of _Maximus_, by espousing
his Cause they had betrayed either an unwarrantable Animosity against
the Orientals, or an inexcusable Credulity in giving Credit to false and
groundless Reports[1180].
[Sidenote: _A Council of all the Western Bishops assembled at_ Rome.]
Upon the Receipt of this Letter, the _Italian_ Bishops, finding
_Theodosius_ no ways disposed to assemble an Oecumenical Council,
applied to _Gratian_, who not only granted them Leave to meet at _Rome_,
the Place they chose, but dispatched Letters to all the Bishops both in
the East and West, giving them Notice of the Time and Place, in which
the Council was to be held, and inviting them to it[1181]. But of all
the Eastern Bishops, Two only complied with this Invitation; _viz._
_Epiphanius_ Bishop of _Salamis_ in the Island of _Cyprus_, and
_Paulinus_, whom all the West acknowleged for lawful Bishop of
_Antioch_. The Western Bishops were all present, either in Person, or by
their Deputies; and _Damasus_ presided[1182]. But, as to the
Transactions of this great Assembly, we are almost intirely in the Dark;
for all we know of them is, that they unanimously agreed not to
communicate with _Flavianus_, the new Bishop of _Antioch_, nor with
_Diodorus_ of _Tarsus_, or _Acacius_ of _Berœa_, who had been chiefly
instrumental in his Promotion; that they condemned the Heresy of
_Apollinaris_; and that, at the Request of _Damasus_, a Confession of
Faith was drawn up by _Jerom_, and approved by the Council, which the
_Apollinarists_ were to sign, upon their being re-admitted to the
Communion of the Church[1183]. As for _Maximus_, they seem to have
abandoned his Cause, being, in all Likelihood, undeceived, with respect
to his Ordination, by _Acholius_ Bishop of _Thessalonica_, and St.
_Jerom_, who assisted at the Council, and could not be Strangers to the
Character of _Maximus_, nor unacquainted with the scandalous Methods by
which he had attained the Episcopal Dignity.
[Sidenote: _The Misunderstanding between the East and the West
increased._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account