The History of the Popes: From the Foundation of the See of Rome, to the Present Time, 3rd Ed. Vol. 1Bower, Archibald
History
The History of the Popes: From the Foundation of the See of Rome, to the Present Time, 3rd Ed. Vol. 1
Bower, Archibald
Catholic Church -- History; Papacy -- History; Popes -- Biography
pretended to have over those Provinces. Upon the Death of _Acholius_ he
conferred the same Dignity on his Successor _Anysius_, as did the
following Popes on the succeeding Bishops of _Thessalonica_, who, by
thus supporting the Pretensions of _Rome_, became the first Bishops,
and, in a manner, the Patriarchs, of _East Illyricum_; for they are
sometimes distinguished with that Title. This, however, was not done
without Opposition, the other Metropolitans not readily acknowleging for
their Superior one who, till that time, had been their Equal[1188].
_Syricius_, who succeeded _Damasus_, inlarging the Power claimed by his
Predecessor, decreed, that no Bishop should be ordained in _East
Illyricum_ without the Consent and Approbation of the Bishop of
_Thessalonica_[1189]. But it was some time before this Decree took
place. Pope _Innocent_ I. writes, that his Predecessors committed to the
Care of _Acholius_, _Achaia_, _Thessaly_, the Two _Epirus’s_, _Candia_,
the Two _Dacia’s_, _Mœsia_, _Dardania_, and _Prævalitana_, now Part
of _Albania_, impowering him to judge and decide the Controversies that
might arise there, and appointing him to be _the first among the
Primates, without prejudicing the Primacy of those Churches_[1190]. Thus
were the Bishops of _Thessalonica_ first appointed Vicars or Vicegerents
of the Bishops of _Rome_, probably in the Year 382. for in that Year
_Acholius_ assisted at the Council of _Rome_, and it was, in all
Likelihood, on that Occasion that _Damasus_ vested him with this new
Dignity. [Sidenote: _The Institution of Vicars improved by the
succeeding Popes._] The Contrivance of _Damasus_ was notably improved by
his Successors, who, in order to extend and inlarge their Authority,
conferred the Title of their Vicars, and the pretended Power annexed to
it, on the most eminent Prelates of other Provinces and Kingdoms,
engaging them thereby to depend upon them, and to promote the Authority
of their See, to the utter Suppression of the antient Rights and
Liberties both of Bishops and Synods. This Dignity was for the most part
annexed to certain Sees, but sometimes conferred on particular Persons.
Thus was _Austin_ appointed the Pope’s Vicar in _England_, _Boniface_ in
_Germany_; and both, in virtue of the Power which they pretended to have
been imparted to them with that Title, usurped and exercised an
Authority above that of Metropolitans. The Institution of Vicars was, by
the succeeding Popes, improved into that of Legates, or, to use _De
Marca_’s Expression, the latter Institution was grafted on the
former[1191]. [Sidenote: _Legates vested with greater Power
than Vicars._] The Legates were vested with a far greater Power than the
Vicars, or, as Pope _Leo_ expresses it, _were admitted to a far greater
Share of his Care, though not to the Plenitude of his Power_[1192]. They
were sent on proper Occasions into all Countries, and never failed
exerting, to the utmost Stretch, their boasted Power, oppressing, in
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account