The History of the Popes: From the Foundation of the See of Rome, to the Present Time, 3rd Ed. Vol. 1Bower, Archibald
History
The History of the Popes: From the Foundation of the See of Rome, to the Present Time, 3rd Ed. Vol. 1
Bower, Archibald
Catholic Church -- History; Papacy -- History; Popes -- Biography
I find nothing else in the antient Writers concerning _Damasus_ worthy
of Notice, besides his generously undertaking the Defence of
_Symmachus_, who, being Prefect of _Rome_ in 384. the last Year of
_Damasus_’s Life, and a _sworn_ Enemy to the Christians, was falsly
accused to the Emperor, as if he had with great Cruelty persecuted and
oppressed them. But _Damasus_ had the Generosity to take his Part, and
clear him, by a Letter he writ to the Emperor, from that Charge[1198].
[Sidenote: Damasus _dies_.] This was one of the last Actions of
_Damasus_’s Life; for he died this Year on the 10th or 11th of
_December_, being then in the Eightieth Year of his Age, after he had
governed the Church of _Rome_ for the Space of Eighteen Years, and about
Two Months[1199]. He was buried, according to _Anastasius_[1200], near
his Mother and Sister, in a Church which he had built at the Catacombs,
on the Way to _Ardea_; whence that Place, though Part of the Cœmetery
of _Calixtus_, is by some called the Cœmetery of _Damasus_[1201]. He
proposed at first being buried near the Remains of St. _Sixtus_, and his
Companions; but afterwards changed his Mind, lest he should disturb the
Ashes of the Saints[1202]. He caused the Church of St. _Laurence_, near
the Theatre of _Pompey_, probably that which his Father and he himself
had formerly served, to be rebuilt, inlarged, and embellished; Whence it
is still known by the joint Titles of St. _Laurence_ and
_Damasus_[1203]. In that Church his Body is worshiped to this Day. But,
how or when it was removed thither, nobody knows[1204]. [Sidenote: _The
Decrees ascribed to him suppositious._] Several Decrees are ascribed to
_Damasus_ by _Gratian_, _Ivo_ of _Chartres_, _Anastasius_, and others,
but all evidently forged by some Impostor blindly addicted to the See of
_Rome_, and quite unacquainted with the Discipline of the Church in the
Fourth Century. In one of them a Canon is quoted from the Council of
Nice, forbidding the Laity to eat or drink of any thing that was
_offered to the holy Priests_, because none but the _Jewish_ Priests
were allowed to eat of the Bread that was offered on the Altar. We know
of no such Canon; and besides, it is not at all probable, that the
Council of _Nice_ would have restrained the Clergy from sharing at least
with the Poor what was offered them. In another of these Decrees the
Paying of Tythes is commanded, on pain of Excommunication; whereas it
might be easily made appear, that, in the Fourth Century, the Offerings
destined for the Maintenance of the Clergy were still voluntary. Another
Decree supposes, that, by an antient Custom, all Metropolitans swore
Fealty to the Apostolic See, and could ordain no Bishops till they had
received the Pall from _Rome_. For the Sake of this, _Baronius_ admits
all the rest: but of such a Custom not the least Mention, or distant
Hint, is to be met with in any antient Writer.
[Sidenote: _His Writings in Prose and Verse._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account