Besides the Letter to the _Corinthians_, of which I have spoken above, several other Pieces are ascribed to _Clement_; _viz_. a second Letter to the _Corinthians_; which is, without all Doubt, very antient; but _Eusebius_ doubts whether it was written by _Clement_[131]; and both St. _Jerom_[132], and _Photius_[133], absolutely reject it. Five other Letters, placed among the Decretals, whereof the first, more antient than the rest, was translated by _Ruffinus_, and is quoted by the Council of _Vaison_, held in 442[134]. However, it is generally looked upon as a spurious Piece; for the Author of it, whoever he was, acquaints St. _James_, Bishop of _Jerusalem_, who died long before St. _Peter_, with St. _Peter_’s Death[135]. [Sidenote: _His_ Itinerary.] _Clement_’s Itinerary, which, in _Photius_’s Time, was prefixed, by way of Preface, to the _Recognitions_[136]. The _Recognitions_, relating, under the Name of _Clement_, the Actions of St. _Peter_, his Interview with _Simon_ the Magician, how _Clement_ himself knew again his Father and his Brothers, whom he had forgot; [Sidenote: _The_ Recognitions.] whence the whole Work took the Name of _Recognitions_, that is, _of knowing again_: it is likewise called the _Itinerary of St._ Peter, the _Acts of St._ Peter, the _Acts of St._ Clement[137]. The _Recognitions_ are quoted by _Origen_[138], _Epiphanius_[139], and _Ruffinus_[140], as the Work of _Clement_, but these Writers, at the same time, own them to have been altered in several Places, and falsified by the Heretics; nay, _Epiphanius_ tells us, that the _Ebionites_ scarce left any thing found in them[141]. The Author was well versed in Philosophy, Mathematics, Astrology, and most other Sciences, but not so well acquainted with the Doctrine of the Church; whence his Work is absolutely rejected by _Athanasius_[142]; and now generally looked upon as a Piece falsely ascribed to _Clement_. [Sidenote: _St._ Peter_’s Dialogues with_ Apion.] St. _Peter_’s _Dialogues_ with _Apion_ were probably written in the Third Century, and to gain Credit fathered upon _Clement_; for _Eusebius_ writes, that there had lately appeared a long Work, under the Name of _Clement_, containing Dialogues between St. _Peter_ and _Apion_[143]. [Sidenote: _The Apostolic Constitutions._] As to the _Apostolic Constitutions_, if that Work is different from _the Doctrine of the Apostles_ mentioned by _Athanasius_ and _Eusebius_; _Epiphanius_ is the first who speaks of it: it appears at least, from _Dionysius_ of _Alexandria_, that, in the Year 250. the Constitutions either had not yet appeared, or were of no Repute in the Church[144]. _Epiphanius_ tells us, that many suspected them; but, as for himself, he received them, since he found nothing in them repugnant to the Faith, or the Discipline of the Church[145]. But as be quotes several Passages out of them, which are not to be found now, we may well conclude, that, since his Time, they have been either altered or curtailed.