The History of the Post Office, from Its Establishment Down to 1836Joyce, Herbert
History
The History of the Post Office, from Its Establishment Down to 1836
Joyce, Herbert
Postal service -- Great Britain -- History
Meanwhile the attorneys both in London and the country had passed
resolutions to the effect that, if the point of law were decided in the
merchants' favour, they would refuse to pay double postage on letters
containing writs. The postmasters-general became alarmed. Single instead
of double postage on letters containing writs as well as patterns and
samples meant, according to the most moderate computation, a reduction
of the Post Office revenue by £10,000 or £12,000 a year. This was a
serious reduction, and how to prevent it was the question to which the
postmasters-general now addressed themselves. It is characteristic of
the time that the first expedient they devised with this object was
simply to refuse to carry any more letters containing patterns and
samples unless the senders of them should agree beforehand to pay double
postage. They argued that, in view of the importance to the merchant to
have his letters carried, any unwillingness on his part to enter into
such an agreement would be easily overcome. A notice to give effect to
their intention was already prepared; but before issuing it they took
the precaution to consult the Attorney-General. His advice to them was
that, admirable as the expedient might be, it was distinctly illegal.
Should they, then, bring one of the special verdicts on to be argued in
Westminster Hall and abide by the judicial decision? To this the
Attorney-General could raise no objection, but he warned them that the
decision was pretty sure to be against the Crown. Driven thus into a
corner, the postmasters-general adopted a most questionable course. They
advocated the passing of an Act which should declare a letter containing
any enclosure, even though not of paper and not weighing as much as an
ounce, to be a double letter; and this advice was followed. In a bill
then before Parliament, having for its object to prevent the fraudulent
removal of tobacco, a clause was inserted which effectually prevented
the merchants from sending their patterns or samples and the lawyers
their writs for single postage.[50]
[50] 26 Geo. II. cap. xiii. sec. 7.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account