The History of the Post Office, from Its Establishment Down to 1836Joyce, Herbert
History
The History of the Post Office, from Its Establishment Down to 1836
Joyce, Herbert
Postal service -- Great Britain -- History
The feeling against the Post Office, which had long been gathering
force, now displayed itself in a remarkable manner. It had been the
constant and uniform practice ever since the Post Office was established
to charge letters containing patterns or samples with double postage. To
this the merchants now demurred. They did not deny that such letters if
weighing as much as an ounce should be charged as for an ounce weight;
but they contended that if weighing less than an ounce they should be
charged as single and not double letters. This contention was founded on
the wording of the Act of Anne, which, after prescribing the postage
which "every single letter or piece of paper" not being of the weight of
one ounce was to pay, enacted that "a double letter" should pay twice
that amount. Was a letter to be charged double because it had in it any
enclosure--a sample of grain, for instance, or a pattern of cloth or of
silk? or to constitute a double letter must not the enclosure be of
paper?
This question the merchants now resolved to try; and accordingly at
Bristol, at Manchester, and at Cirencester proceedings were commenced
against the local postmasters for demanding and receiving more than the
legal postage. It affords striking evidence of the widespread
dissatisfaction then existing that in 1753 a practice as old as the Post
Office itself should have been challenged for the first time, still more
that it should have been challenged at three separate places, distant
from one another, simultaneously. The action against the postmaster of
Cirencester came on first. It was tried at the Gloucester Assizes before
a special jury, when a special verdict was found upon the words of the
statute, whether a letter containing a pattern or sample and not being
of the weight of one ounce ought to pay double or single postage. The
postmasters-general, anxious to avoid a multiplicity of suits, now
opened communications with the merchants of Bristol and Manchester.
Would it not be well that their suits should be abandoned? One special
verdict would serve as well as a hundred such verdicts would do to
settle the point of law between the Crown and the subject. Having
succeeded in one county, what more could they expect in another? Or what
advantage would follow that had not been already secured? These
overtures came too late. The merchants were determined to fight to the
bitter end. The suits came on both at Bristol and at Manchester; and at
each of those places a special verdict was given in almost identical
terms with that which had been returned at Gloucester.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account