The history of the psychoanalytic movementFreud, Sigmund
History
The history of the psychoanalytic movement
Freud, Sigmund
Psychoanalysis -- History
The formation of an official organization I considered necessary because
I feared the abuses to which psychoanalysis would be subjected, once it
should achieve popularity. I felt that there should be a place that
could give the dictum: “With all this nonsense, analysis has nothing to
do; this is not psychoanalysis.” It was decided that at the meeting of
the local groups which together formed the international organization,
instruction should be given how psychoanalysis should be practised, that
physicians should be trained there and that the local society should, in
a way, stand sponsor for them. It also appeared to me desirable that the
adherents of psychoanalysis should meet for friendly intercourse and
mutual support, inasmuch as official science had pronounced its great
ban and boycott against physicians and institutions practising
psychoanalysis.
This and nothing else I wished to attain by the founding of the
“International Psychoanalytic Association.” Perhaps it was more than
could possibly be attained. Just as my opponents learned that it was not
possible to stem the new movement, so I had to learn, by experience,
that it would not permit itself to be led along the particular path
which I had laid out for it. The motion made by Ferenczi at Nuremberg
was seconded. Jung was elected president, and Riklin was chosen as
secretary. It was also decided to publish a corresponding journal
through which the central association was “to foster and further the
science of psychoanalysis as founded by Freud both as pure psychology,
as well as in its application to medicine and the mental sciences, and
to promote assistance among the members in all their efforts to acquire
and to spread psychoanalytic knowledge.” The members of the Vienna group
alone firmly opposed the project with passionate excitement. Adler
expressed his fear that “a censorship and limitation of scientific
freedom” was intended. The Viennese finally gave in, after having gained
their point that Zürich should not be raised to the center of the
association, but that the center should be the home city of the
president, who was to be elected for two years.
At this congress three local groups were constituted: one in Berlin
under the chairmanship of Abraham, one in Zürich, whose chairman became
the president of the central association, and one in Vienna, the
chairmanship of which I relinquished to Adler. A fourth group, in
Budapest, could not be formed until later. On account of illness Bleuler
had been absent from the congress. Later he evinced considerable
hesitation about entering the association and although he let himself be
persuaded to do so by my personal representations, he resigned a short
time afterwards owing to disagreements at Zürich. This severed the
connection between the Zürich group and the Burghölzli institution.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account