The History of the Rise, Increase, and Progress of the Christian People Called Quakers: Intermixed with Several Remarkable Occurrencs.Sewel, William
History
The History of the Rise, Increase, and Progress of the Christian People Called Quakers: Intermixed with Several Remarkable Occurrencs.
Sewel, William
Society of Friends -- History -- Early works to 1800
But I return now to Bristol, where several were kept in prison still,
and no liberty granted them; nay, they were even charged with what
they utterly denied themselves to be guilty of. Among these, one John
Worring was accused of having called the priest, Samuel Grimes, a
devil: but Worring denied this, though he did not stick to say, he
could prove somewhat like it by his own words. And it being asked him
how, he answered, that the priest had said at the meeting, that in all
things he did, he sinned; and if in all things, then as well in his
preaching, as in other things; and he that sinneth is of the devil.
If you will not believe me, believe the Scriptures. It may be easily
conjectured that this answer did not please the priests’ followers, and
therefore Worring and some others were kept in prison: and among these
also Elizabeth Marshall, who in the steeple-house, after the priest
John Knowls had dismissed the people with what is called the blessing,
spoke to him, and said, ‘This is the word of the Lord to thee. I warn
thee to repent, and to mind the light of Christ in thy conscience.’ And
when the people, by order of the magistrates then present, violently
assaulted her, giving her many blows with staves and cudgels, she
cried out, ‘The mighty day of the Lord is at hand, wherein he will
strike terror on the wicked.’ Some time before she spoke also in the
steeple-house to the priest Ralph Farmer, after he had ended his sermon
and prayer, and said, ‘This is the word of the Lord to thee. Wo, wo, wo
from the Lord to them who take the word of the Lord in their mouths,
and the Lord never sent them.’
A good while after this, the magistrates gave out the following warrant:
_‘City of Bristol._
‘To all the constables within this city, and to every one of them.
‘Forasmuch as information hath been given us, that John Camm, and
John Audland, two strangers, who were commanded to depart this
city, have, in contempt of authority, come into this city again,
to the disturbance of the public peace: these are therefore to
will and require you forthwith to apprehend them, and bring them
before us to be examined, according to law. Given this 22d of
January, 1654. Signed,
_William Cann_,
_Joseph Jackson_,
_Gabriel Sherman_,
_Richard Vickris, Dept. Mayor_,
_Henry Gibbs_,
_John Lock_.’
Camm and Audland had departed the town before this time, having never
been commanded, (as the warrant saith,) to depart the city, either by
the magistrates themselves, or by any other at their command; though
F. Howgill and E. Burrough had been required to do so. So this warrant
proving ineffectual, the magistrates caused another to be formed in
these words:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account