The history of the rise, progress, and establishment of the independence of the United States of America, Vol. 1 (of 3) : $b Including an account of the late war, and of the thirteen colonies, from their origin to that periodGordon, William
History
The history of the rise, progress, and establishment of the independence of the United States of America, Vol. 1 (of 3) : $b Including an account of the late war, and of the thirteen colonies, from their origin to that period
Gordon, William
United States -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775; United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783
[Nov. 3.] A month after the arrival of the troops at _Boston_ Mr.
_Hancock_ was served with a precept for £.9000 sterling, by the marshal
of the court of admiralty. The marshal having arrested him, demanded
bail for £.3000. Five other gentlemen were arrested for the like sum. He
and the five others gave bail.—The commissioners prosecuted the supposed
owner, and each person they imagined concerned in unloading the wines,
for the value of the whole cargo and treble damages. The vessel seized
was restored after a long detention; and the suits in the courts of
admiralty dropped, March the twenty-sixth, 1769, by a declaration from
the king’s advocate, that his majesty would prosecute no further. It was
idle to think of supporting the prosecution by sufficient evidence. Want
of inclination or fear would prevent witnesses appearing, and corruption
would procure counterevidence from men of no principle, who would
justify themselves from the prosecution’s being built upon acts of
parliament, to which they supposed the colonies owed no obedience; and
would plead, as in too many instances is done at home, that it is not he
who takes, but he who imposes the oath, who is chargeable with the crime
of swearing falsely. The law would not allow the prosecuted any costs or
damages. In this case the allowance would have been unreasonable; the
innocence of the parties could not have been urged in its behalf.
The colonists could not overlook the good effects produced by the former
non-importation agreement; and were earnest for playing off the same
engine against the new attempts of ministry, to saddle them with the
payment of taxes. About the beginning of April, several gentlemen of
_Boston_ and _New-York_, wrote to others at _Philadelphia_, in order to
learn, whether they would unite with them in stopping the importation of
goods from _Great-Britain_, until certain acts of parliament should be
repealed, which were thought to be injurious to their rights, as freemen
and British subjects. A numerous meeting of merchants followed, when an
address was read to them. It set forth the claims of the colonies, and
then went into an enumeration of grievances, which the colonists had
long borne, and seemed willing to forget, had they not been alarmed
afresh by the late proceedings of the ministry. The address remarked,
that, in the act obliging the several assemblies to provide quarters for
the soldiers, &c. a power is granted to every officer, upon obtaining a
warrant from any justice (which warrant the justice is empowered and
ordered to grant, without any previous oath) to break into any house by
day or by night, under pretence (these are the words of the act) of
searching for deserters. It pointed out to them the danger they were in,
of having erected over them a despotic government, to rule them as
slaves. It called upon them to deliberate, by what means they might
defend their rights and liberties, and obtain a repeal of the obnoxious
acts.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account