The history of the rise, progress, and establishment of the independence of the United States of America, Vol. 1 (of 3) : $b Including an account of the late war, and of the thirteen colonies, from their origin to that periodGordon, William
History
The history of the rise, progress, and establishment of the independence of the United States of America, Vol. 1 (of 3) : $b Including an account of the late war, and of the thirteen colonies, from their origin to that period
Gordon, William
United States -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775; United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783
The New-Yorkers were in general faithful, while their non-importation
agreement lasted; more so, it was thought, than the Bostonians. These
suffered much in their reputation among the sons of liberty at New-York
and Philadelphia, for the large quantities of goods found by some of the
newspaper publications, to have been imported into Boston. Some of the
inhabitants were desirous of rolling away much of the reproach, by
pointing out that, a considerable part of the goods charged to the score
of Boston, belonged to Salem, Marblehead, and other ports; but when the
non-importation agreements were ended, it was omitted, and thus they
continued to lie under greater disgrace than really belonged to them.
While the New-York plan was carrying on, a trial was made by about a
dozen persons, to frighten the gentlemen who were inclined to import,
from so doing, but it failed, the populace had been secured.
[April 12.] The king gave his assent to the act for repealing the duties
on glass, paper, and colours. The tea duty was professedly continued as
a pepper corn rent, for the point of honor, and as a badge of
sovereignty over the colonies. The ministry might also mean to use it in
some future period, for deeper purposes than could be then fathomed.
They intended in the beginning of the session to bring in a bill against
American associations; but the violence of party was such, that it was
thought the times would not admit of it. The strong opposition made to
ministerial measures at home, was certainly helpful to the cause of the
colonies, and encouraged them to go those lengths which they would
otherwise have scarce ventured upon. This, however, was not to be
charged to the anti-ministerialists, as an evil for which they were
answerable. Let ministers attempt at any time to make unjustifiable
inroads upon the liberties of British subjects, their opponents are
bound in duty, as the guardians of the public, to use all warrantable
efforts to disconcert them and the mischief which follows is to be
placed to the account of those who render the opposition a necessary
measure.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account