The history of the rise, progress, and establishment of the independence of the United States of America, Vol. 1 (of 3) : $b Including an account of the late war, and of the thirteen colonies, from their origin to that period — John Shaqi
The history of the rise, progress, and establishment of the independence of the United States of America, Vol. 1 (of 3) : $b Including an account of the late war, and of the thirteen colonies, from their origin to that periodGordon, William
History
The history of the rise, progress, and establishment of the independence of the United States of America, Vol. 1 (of 3) : $b Including an account of the late war, and of the thirteen colonies, from their origin to that period
Gordon, William
United States -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775; United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783
_Connecticut_ and _New-Haven_ continued two distinct colonies for many
years. At length the general court of Connecticut determined to prefer
an address and petition to Charles II. professing their subjection and
loyalty to his majesty, and soliciting a royal charter; and John
Winthrop, esq. who had been chosen governor, was appointed to negociate
the affair with the king. He succeeded, and a royal charter was
obtained, April 23, 1662, constituting the two colonies forever one body
corporate and politic. New-Haven took the affair ill; and for some time
declined the union. But difficulties were amicably settled at last, and
the colonies united by agreement. [1665.]
The royal charter established a pure democracy. Every power, as well
deliberative as active, was invested in the freemen of the corporation
or their delegates, and the colony was under no obligation to
communicate the acts of their local legislature to the king. It was the
same as to the _royal_ charter, granted the next year to _Rhode-Island
and Providence Plantations_.[23]
[1685.] In July various articles of high misdemeanor were exhibited
against the governor and company of Connecticut, and orders were given
to issue a writ of _quo warranto_ forthwith against the colony. The next
year two writs were served by Mr. _Randolph_; and after them a third in
December. This is taken notice of by the governor and company in their
letter of Jan. 26, 1686–7, wherein they mention their readiness to
submit to his majesty’s royal commands; and that, “if it be to conjoin
them with the other colonies and provinces under Sir _Edmund Andros_, it
would be more pleasing than to be joined with any other province.” Such
professed submission probably prevented the _quo warranto’s_ being
prosecuted with effect; and produced an order to Andros to accept the
surrender of the charter and the submission of the colony. Sir Edmond
went to _Hartford_ in October; but when at night he expected the charter
would have been surrendered into his hands, the candle was blown out,
and the charter withdrawn from the table, carried off and secreted by
one of the company: whose extraordinary service was afterwards rewarded
by the general assembly with five shillings, agreeable to the plain
simple manners of the people. He however published in the general court
his orders and commission which every one tacitly obeyed. He dissolved
the former government, and assumed the administration, receiving into
his legislative council the late governor and secretary, for the better
carrying on the business of the colony. The subsequent revolution in
England brought matters back, after a while to the former course; as the
legal validity of the charter was admitted.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account