The history of the rise, progress, and establishment of the independence of the United States of America, Vol. 1 (of 3) : $b Including an account of the late war, and of the thirteen colonies, from their origin to that periodGordon, William
History
The history of the rise, progress, and establishment of the independence of the United States of America, Vol. 1 (of 3) : $b Including an account of the late war, and of the thirteen colonies, from their origin to that period
Gordon, William
United States -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775; United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783
Notwithstanding Mr. Penn is celebrated as the wisest of legislators, the
assembly, about the year 1704, unanimously came to nine resolutions, in
which they complain with great grief of him, “for undermining his own
foundations; and by a subtle contrivance, laid deeper than the
capacities of some could fathom, finding a way to lay aside the act of
settlement, and dissove his second charter.”[47] He was likewise charged
with having extorted from the province great sums of money. They
complained also of the abuses of surveyors, the clerks of the courts,
and justices of the peace, who, they said, were all put in by the
proprietary, so that he became his own judge in his own cause.—These and
other matters were the heads of a representation, or rather
remonstrance, drawn up and sent to Mr. Penn, then in England, in which
he is represented as an oppressor, and as falsifying his word in almost
every respect, with the provincials.[48]
The disputes which subsisted in Pennsylvania were greatly augmented by
the intemperance of the quakers themselves, who, notwithstanding all
their zeal for liberty of conscience, persecuted about or soon after
1694, George Keith (who had been one of their most famous preachers)
upon his conforming to the church of England; and went so far as to
throw him into prison. They apologized for their conduct by pleading,
that they did not punish him for his religious principles, but for
having insulted the civil government.[49] If this was a good plea, the
New-Englanders might gain great advantages from it, in vindicating
themselves as to many of the severities they practised upon the quakers,
who insulted their civil governments, beyond what will be easily
credited by those who have not had the opportunity of knowing the
transactions of that period, or are not acquainted with the abusive
language of some of the then leaders of that denomination—language which
the body of modern quakers will not vindicate.
It only remains to give a concise account of the settlement of
_Georgia_.
In 1732 a number of gentlemen, considering the vast benefit that might
arise from the tract of land lying between the Savannah and the river
Altamahat petitioned the king for a charter, which was accordingly
granted on the ninth of June. They meant that the country should be made
a bulwark for the southern colonies against the Spaniards; and should
give employment to numbers of people who were burthensome at home to
their friends and parishes. The charter constituted them a corporation,
by the name of trustees for establishing a colony, by the name of
Georgia, including the country from the most northern stream of the
Savannah, to the most southern stream of the Altamaha. The corporation
was to subsist for 21 years; and after the expiration of that term, the
governor and all officers were to be appointed by the crown.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account