The history of the seal of the United States — John Shaqi
The history of the seal of the United StatesHunt, Gaillard
History
The history of the seal of the United States
Hunt, Gaillard
United States -- History
Regarding the scroll containing the “E pluribus unum” we consider the
present form altogether the best to use as the sheet scroll mentioned
would interfere with the eagle, while the old form of scroll falls in
well with the general design. The dies will be cut in steel.
This letter may be said to be the argument for the Whitehouse designs.
They were submitted to Mr. Champlin, who wrote, January 7, 1885:
It seems to me useless to regret that Congress did not adopt in 1782 a
different device for the great seal of the United States. The present
device was legally adopted and all we can do is to follow the
provisions of the act, having an eye, of course, to general heraldic
propriety; but even if the laws of heraldry are transgressed in some
minor particulars, I think we still are bound to follow the letter of
the law, despite the rules of heraldry. If we must have a strictly
heraldic seal, let us go to work ab initio and change the law.
If this be, as I believe it to be, the true way of dealing with the
question, let us see whether the designs furnished by Tiffany & Co.
fulfill the provisions of the law.
1. The law reads “Paleways of thirteen pieces, argent and gules, a
chief, azure”. The drawing marked A is correct in this particular.
This differs from the order of the stripes on the national
ensign. * * * The pales should all be of the same width.
2. “The escutcheon on the breast of the American eagle displayed
proper.” In Mr. Barton’s device of June 13, 1782, of which that
adopted by the committee is a modification, the American Eagle is
expressly called “the bald-headed eagle”, so there can be no question
on that point. The eagle must be an American eagle and not the
ordinary heraldic eagle. It must be displayed, not with _wings
displayed_ (in which case it would be represented perched), but
displayed—that is, with both wings and talons extended. In my opinion
the drawing is correct, though I would suggest that the treatment,
especially the wings, might be a little less realistic, and still
comply with the law.
3. “Holding in his dexter talon an olive branch, and in his sinister a
bundle of thirteen arrows, all proper, and in his beak” etc. The olive
branch and arrows should, of course, be of the conventional form as no
other is specified.
4. Crest—“A glory, or, breaking through a cloud, proper, and
surrounding thirteen stars forming a constellation, argent, on an
azure field.” This is bad, very bad, heraldically, but I see no way
out but to reproduce the original, which I think is done in the
drawing.
Reverse. “A pyramid unfinished.” The law does not call for a pyramid
of thirteen courses of stone. * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account