The history of the seal of the United StatesHunt, Gaillard
History
The history of the seal of the United States
Hunt, Gaillard
United States -- History
For my part [wrote Benjamin Franklin January 26, 1784, to his
daughter], I wish the bald eagle had not been chosen as the
representative of our country; he is a bird of bad moral character; he
does not get his living honestly; you may have seen him perched on
some dead tree, where, too lazy to fish for himself, he watches the
labor of the fishing-hawk; and, when that diligent bird has at length
taken a fish, and is bearing it to his nest for the support of his
mate and young ones, the bald eagle pursues him, and takes it from
him. With all this injustice he is never in good case; but, like those
among men who live by sharping and robbing, he is generally poor, and
often very lousy. Besides, he is a rank coward; the little _kingbird_,
not bigger than a sparrow, attacks him boldly and drives him out of
the district. He is therefore by no means a proper emblem for the
brave and honest Cincinnati of America, who have driven all the
_kingbirds_ from our country; though exactly fit for that order of
knights, which the French call _Chevaliers d’Industrie_.
I am, on this account, not displeased that the figure is not known as
a bald eagle, but looks more like a turkey. For in truth, the turkey
is in comparison a much more respectable bird, and withal a true
original native of America. Eagles have been found in all countries,
but the turkey was peculiar to ours; the first of the species seen in
Europe, being brought to France by the Jesuits from Canada, and served
up at the wedding table of Charles the Ninth. He is, besides, (though
a little vain and silly, it is true, but not the worse emblem for
that,) a bird of courage, and would not hesitate to attack a grenadier
of the British guards, who should presume to invade his farmyard with
a _red_ coat on.[32]
The seal itself has, of course, a very limited use, which is strictly
guarded by law. The Secretary of State is its custodian, but even he has
no authority to affix it to any paper that does not bear the President’s
signature.
In 1803 Chief Justice Marshall, in delivering an opinion of the Supreme
Court, used the following language relative to the seal. It may be
considered applicable to all instruments to which the seal is affixed.
The signature [of the President] is a warrant for affixing the great
seal to the commission, and the great seal is only to be affixed to an
instrument which is complete. It attests, by an act supposed to be of
public notoriety, the verity of the presidential signature.
It is never to be affixed till the commission is signed, because the
signature which gives force and effect to the commission, is
conclusive evidence that the appointment is made.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account