The history of the South African forces in FranceBuchan, John
History
The history of the South African forces in France
Buchan, John
South Africa. Army; World War, 1914-1918 -- Campaigns -- France; World War, 1914-1918 -- Regimental histories -- South Africa
For this new duty Haig had not received proportionate reinforcements. He
had now a front of 125 miles, and he did not dare to weaken his north and
central sections, where, in the case of an attack, he had but little room
to manœuvre. So he was compelled to leave the Fifth Army on his right in
a condition of perilous weakness. Gough on his forty-mile front had no
more than eleven divisions in line, and three infantry and two cavalry
divisions in reserve. His right three divisions were holding 30,000
yards—an average of one bayonet to the yard, while the German average was
four.
There was the further handicap that the Germans from their position
inside the great salient in the west could concentrate with ease a force
of attack, and until the actual assault was made the Allied Command
would not know on which side of the salient the blow would fall. For
Ludendorff’s dispositions would threaten the French in Champagne as much
as the British at St. Quentin. There was still no centralized command,
though the Versailles Council provided something in the nature of a
unified Staff. Hence it would not be easy to arrange for co-operation
with Pétain and for the support of French reserves till the battle had
developed, for the French commander would not unreasonably desire to keep
his reserves at a point where they could be used with equal facility for
St. Quentin or Champagne. Yet it was to French support that Gough must
look in the first instance, since the available British reserves had been
allotted to Byng, and it would take time to bring troops from Plumer and
Horne in the north.
The British Command attempted to atone for its weakness in numbers
by devising defences of exceptional strength. In front, along the
ground held by Byng and Gough, lay the “forward zone” organized in two
sections—a line of outposts to give the alarm and fall back, and a
well-wired line of resistance. In both were a number of skilfully placed
redoubts armed with machine guns, and so arranged that any enemy advance
would be drawn on between them, so as to come under cross fire. The
spaces between the redoubts were to be protected by a barrage of field
guns and corps heavy guns. The line of resistance and the redoubts were
intended to hold out till the last, and to receive no support from the
rear, except for such counter-attacks as might be necessary. The purpose
of this “forward zone” was to break up an advancing enemy, and the
principle of its organization was “blobs” rather than a continuous line.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account