The next references in proof that the "lost" tribes were "no more to be called Israel," but by another name, is a typical instance of the perversion of even the most beautiful spiritual truths of the Bible for mere outward, I was going to say, _carnal_, ends. The first quotation in proof of this point is from Isa. lxii. 2: "Thou shalt be called by a new name which the mouth of the Lord shall name." This short chapter is one of the most precious and beautiful in the whole Old Testament, and it is like laying hold of an exquisitely delicate and beautiful work of art with a rough and dirty hand to treat it as Anglo-Israel "theologians" do. The chapter begins: "For _Zion's sake_ will I not hold My peace, and for _Jerusalem's sake_ I will not rest until her righteousness go forth as brightness and her salvation as a lamp that burneth." The speaker is either the prophet, or very probably the servant of Jehovah, the Messiah, who is the speaker in the preceding chapter. The subject is "Zion" or "Jerusalem," which includes the people. I believe that it includes the _whole nation_ of which Jerusalem is the God-appointed metropolis; but if it is to be limited to any part of the people, then it is certainly _Judah_, of which Zion or Jerusalem is the capital, and not the Ten Tribes who are here spoken of. This Zion, for whom the Messiah makes unceasing intercession, is now ‎called ‏עֲזוּבָה‎--"forsaken," and her land ‎‏שְׁמָמָה‎--"desolate"; but when God's light shall again break upon her, and her righteousness goes forth as a lamp that burneth, "Thou shalt be called חֶפְצִי-בָהּ‏ (Hephzibah, _i.e._, My delight is in her); and thy land ‏בְּעוּלָה‎" (Beulah, _i.e._, married). But the new name by which the mouth of Jehovah shall then call her shall not only answer the outward transformation which shall then come over the people and the land, but will describe the _inward_ transformation and the true character of the people. In fact, we are told in this very chapter what the new name shall be. They shall call them--Saxons? Britons? No, "they shall call them the Holy People, _The Redeemed of the Lord_." This is also the "other-name" in Isa. lxv. 15, by which God shall call His true servants in contrast to the ungodly in the nation, who shall be "slain," and leave their name (_i.e._, their remembrance) as a proverbial "curse" unto His chosen. The next reference given in proof that the Ten Tribes were to lose their name is Psalm lxxxiii. 4: "The name of Israel shall be no more in remembrance." This is a typical and characteristic specimen of the manner in which Anglo-Israel "theologians" deal with Scripture. It reminds one of the grounds adduced by a certain individual for paying no heed to the Old Testament because it is written, "_Hang_ the law and the prophets" (Matt. xxii. 40). It is certainly most easy to prove almost anything from the Bible by breaking away an isolated sentence from its connection, and attaching to it a meaning which was never intended.