The History of the Thirty Years' WarSchiller, Friedrich
History
The History of the Thirty Years' War
Schiller, Friedrich
Europe -- History -- 1517-1648; Thirty Years' War, 1618-1648
It is difficult to say what would have been the fate of the Reformation,
and the liberties of the Empire, had not the formidable power of Austria
declared against them. This, however, appears certain, that nothing
so completely damped the Austrian hopes of universal monarchy, as the
obstinate war which they had to wage against the new religious opinions.
Under no other circumstances could the weaker princes have roused
their subjects to such extraordinary exertions against the ambition of
Austria, or the States themselves have united so closely against the
common enemy.
The power of Austria never stood higher than after the victory which
Charles V. gained over the Germans at Muehlberg. With the treaty of
Smalcalde the freedom of Germany lay, as it seemed, prostrate for ever;
but it revived under Maurice of Saxony, once its most formidable enemy.
All the fruits of the victory of Muehlberg were lost again in the
congress of Passau, and the diet of Augsburg; and every scheme for civil
and religious oppression terminated in the concessions of an equitable
peace.
The diet of Augsburg divided Germany into two religious and two
political parties, by recognizing the independent rights and existence
of both. Hitherto the Protestants had been looked on as rebels; they
were henceforth to be regarded as brethren -- not indeed through
affection, but necessity. By the Interim*, the Confession of Augsburg
was allowed temporarily to take a sisterly place alongside of the olden
religion, though only as a tolerated neighbour. To every secular state
was conceded the right of establishing the religion it acknowledged as
supreme and exclusive within its own territories, and of forbidding the
open profession of its rival. Subjects were to be free to quit a country
where their own religion was not tolerated. The doctrines of Luther for
the first time received a positive sanction; and if they were trampled
under foot in Bavaria and Austria, they predominated in Saxony and
Thuringia. But the sovereigns alone were to determine what form of
religion should prevail within their territories; the feelings of
subjects who had no representatives in the diet were little attended to
in the pacification. In the ecclesiastical territories, indeed, where
the unreformed religion enjoyed an undisputed supremacy, the free
exercise of their religion was obtained for all who had previously
embraced the Protestant doctrines; but this indulgence rested only
on the personal guarantee of Ferdinand, King of the Romans, by whose
endeavours chiefly this peace was effected; a guarantee, which, being
rejected by the Roman Catholic members of the Diet, and only inserted
in the treaty under their protest, could not of course have the force of
law.
* A system of Theology so called, prepared by order of the Emperor
Charles V. for the use of Germany, to reconcile the differences between
the Roman Catholics and the Lutherans, which, however, was rejected by
both parties -- Ed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account