The history of witchcraft and demonologySummers, Montague
History
The history of witchcraft and demonology
Summers, Montague
Demonology; Demonology -- History; Witchcraft; Witchcraft -- History
How then are we to regard this mighty movement at which it were folly
to sneer, which it is impossible to ignore? The Catholic Church does
neither. But none the less she condemns it utterly and entirely. Not
because she disbelieves in it, but because she believes in it so
thoroughly, because she knows what is the real nature of the moving
forces, however skilfully they may disguise themselves, however quick
and subtle their shifts and turns, the intelligences which inform and
direct the whole. It is a painful subject since (I reiterate) many
good people, no doubt many thoughtful seekers after truth, have been
fascinated and swept along by Spiritism. They are as yet conscious of
neither physical nor moral harm, and, it may be, they have been playing
with the fire for years. Nay more, Spiritism has been a sweet solace
to many in most poignant hours of bitter sorrow and loss; wherefore
it is hallowed in their eyes by tenderest memories. They are woefully
deceived. Hard as it may seem, we must get down to the bed-rock of
fact. Spiritism has been specifically condemned on no less than four
occasions by the Holy Office,[120] whose decree, 30 March, 1898, utterly
forbids all Spiritistic practices although intercourse with demons be
strictly excluded, and communication sought with good spirits only.
Modern Spiritism is merely Witchcraft revived. The Second Plenary Council
of Baltimore (1866), whilst making ample allowance for prestidigitation
and trickery of every kind, warns the faithful against lending any
support whatsoever to Spiritism and forbids them to attend séances even
out of idle curiosity, for some, at least, of the manifestations must
necessarily be ascribed to Satanic intervention since in no other manner
can they be understood or explained.
NOTES TO CHAPTER VI
[1] E. de Rougé, _Étude sur une stèle Égyptienne_, Paris, 1858: E. A. W.
Budge, _Egyptian Magic_, VII.
[2] _Rekh Khet_, “knower of things.”
[3] Euripides, _Bacchæ_: passim; Ovid, _Metamorphoses_, III. 513, _sqq._;
Apollodorus, III. v. 2.; Hyginus, _Fabulæ_, 184; Nonnus, _Dionysiaca
(Bassarica)_, XIV, 46.
[4] Sophocles, _Ajax_; Pindar, _Nemea_, VII, 25; Ovid, _Metamorphoses_,
XIII, 1-398.
[5] Pausanias, III, xvi, 6.
[6] Valerius Maximus, I, 11, 5. Lacinium was a promontory on the east
coast of Bruttium, a few miles south of Croton, and forming the western
boundary of the Tarentine gulf. The remains of the temple of Juno Lacinia
are still extant, and have given the modern name to the promontory, _Capo
delle Colonne_ or _Capo di Nao_ (ναός).
[7] Xenophon, _Memorabilia_, II. i. 5; Demosthenes, XCIII, 24; Dinarchus,
CI, 41; Plutarch, _Lucullus_, IV.
[8] Euripides, _Orestes_, l. 854, and l. 79.
[9] Cf. μάντις.
[10] Cf. Vergil _Æneid_, IV. 471-3:
Agamemnonius scænis agitatus Orestes
armatam facibus matrem et serpentibus atris
cum fugit, ultricesque sedent in limine Diræ.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account