The history of witchcraft and demonology — John Shaqi
The history of witchcraft and demonologySummers, Montague
History
The history of witchcraft and demonology
Summers, Montague
Demonology; Demonology -- History; Witchcraft; Witchcraft -- History
It is very obvious why the Holy See so sagaciously preferred to assign
the prosecution of heretics, a matter of the first importance, to an
extraordinary tribunal rather than leave the trials in the hands of the
bishops. Without taking into consideration the fact that these new duties
would have seriously encroached upon, if not wholly absorbed, the time
and activities of a bishop, the prelates who ruled most dioceses were
the subject of some monarch with whom they might have come in conflict
on many a delicate point which could easily be conceived to arise, and
the result of such disagreement would have been fraught with endless
political difficulties and internal embarrassments. A court of religious,
responsible to the Pope alone, would act more fairly, more freely,
without fear or favour. The profligate Philip I of France, for example,
during his long, worthless, and dishonoured reign (1060-1108), by his
evil courses drew upon himself the censure of the Church, whereupon
he banished the Bishop of Beauvais and revoked the decisions of the
episcopal courts.[44] In a letter[45] to William, Count of Poitiers,
Pope S. Gregory VII energetically declares that if the King does not
cease from molesting the bishops and interfering with their judicature
a sentence of excommunication will be launched. In another letter the
same pontiff complains of the disrespect shown to the ecclesiastical
tribunals, and addressing the French bishops he cries: “Your king, who
sooth to say should be termed not a king but a cruel tyrant, inspired
by Satan, is the head and cause of these evils. For he has notoriously
passed all his days in foulest crimes, in seeking to do wickedness and to
ensue it.”[46] The conflict of the bishops of a realm with an unworthy
and evil monarch is a commonplace of history. These troubles could
scarcely arise in the case of courts forane.
The words “inquisition” and “inquisitors” began definitely to acquire
their accepted signification in the earlier half of the thirteenth
century. Thus in 1235 Gregory IX writes to the Archbishop of Sens: “Know
then that we have charged the Provincial of the Order of Preachers in
this same realm to nominate certain of his brethren, who are best fitted
for so weighty a business, as Inquisitors that they may proceed against
all notorious evildoers in the aforesaid realm ... and we also charge
thee, dear Brother, that thou shouldest be instant and zealous in this
matter of establishing an Inquisition by the appointment of those who
seem to be best fitted for such a work, and let thy loins be girded,
Brother, to fight boldly the battles of the Lord.”[47] In 1246 Innocent
IV wrote to the Superiors of the Franciscans giving them leave to recall
at will: “those brethren who have been sent abroad to preach the Mystery
of the Cross of Christ, or to seek out and take measure against the
plague sore of heresy.”[48]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account