Women -- Suffrage -- History; Women -- Suffrage -- United States -- History; Women's rights -- History; Women's rights -- United States -- History
On January 25, 1887, Senator Blair again called up his resolution and
a spirited debate followed. Senators Joseph E. Brown (Ga.) and George
G. Vest (Mo.) represented the negative; Henry W. Blair (N. H.) and
Joseph N. Dolph (Ore.) the affirmative. Senator Brown opened the
discussion by presenting, word for word, the report signed by Senator
Francis M. Cockrell (Mo.) and himself in 1884. It embodied the stock
objections to woman suffrage, practically all in fact which are ever
made, and was in part as follows:[34]
Mr. President, the joint resolution introduced by my friend, the
Senator from New Hampshire, proposing an amendment to the
Constitution of the United States, conferring the right to vote
upon the women of the United States, is one of paramount
importance, as it involves great questions far-reaching in their
tendency, which seriously affect the very pillars of our social
fabric, which involve the peace and harmony of society, the unity
of the family, and much of the future success of our
Government....
I believe that the Creator intended that the sphere of the males
and females of our race should be different, and that their
duties and obligations, while they differ materially, are equally
important and equally honorable, and that each sex is equally
well qualified by natural endowments for the discharge of the
important duties which pertain to each, and that each sex is
equally competent to discharge those duties.
We find an abundance of evidence, both _in the works of nature_
and in the Divine revelation, to establish the fact that the
family properly regulated is the foundation and pillar of
society, and is the most important of any other human
institution. In the Divine economy it is provided that the man
shall be the head of the family, and shall take upon himself the
solemn obligation of providing for and protecting the family.
Man, by reason of his physical strength, and his other endowments
and faculties, is qualified for the discharge of those duties
that require strength and ability to combat with the sterner
realities and difficulties of life. It is not only his duty to
provide for and protect the family, but as a member of the
community it is also his duty to discharge the laborious and
responsible obligations which the family owe to the State, and
which obligations must be discharged by the head of the family,
until the male members have grown up to manhood and are able to
aid in the discharge of those obligations, when it becomes their
duty each in turn to take charge of and rear a family, for which
he is responsible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account