Women -- Suffrage -- History; Women -- Suffrage -- United States -- History; Women's rights -- History; Women's rights -- United States -- History
"Behold, the fields are white unto harvest, but the laborers are
few!" How can it be longer tolerated that the wives and mothers,
the sisters and daughters, of a land claiming the highest degree
of civilization and boasting of freedom as its watchword, should
still rank before the law with criminals, idiots and slaves? I
feel as confident as I do of my existence, that the apathy which
we are now fighting against, especially among our own sex,
springs mainly from want of thought; the women of culture
throughout the country placidly accept the comfortable conditions
in which they find themselves. They receive without question the
formulated theories of woman's sphere as they accept the
formulated theories of the orthodox religions into which they may
chance to have been born; occasionally an original thinker steps
out of the ranks and finds herself after a while with a few
followers. They remain but few, however, for it is too much
trouble to think.
At the evening session the Rev. Florence Kollock (Ills.) spoke on The
Ethics of Woman Suffrage, saying in part:
By what moral right stands a law upon the statute books that
infringes upon the rights and duties of womanhood, that prohibits
a mother from the full discharge of the duties of her sacred
office, as all are prohibited through the law that forbids them
the opportunity of throwing their whole moral strength, influence
and convictions against the existence and growth of social and
political iniquities and in defense of truth and purity? The
great evils of our day are of such a nature that all, regardless
of moral principles or sex, suffer from their effects, proving
clearly that all have a moral obligation in these matters, and
the fact that one human being suffers from an evil carries with
it the highest authority to remove that evil.
The silent influence of woman has failed to accomplish the
desired good of humanity, has failed to bring about the needed
moral reforms, and all observing persons are ready to concede
that posing is a weak way of combating giant evils--that
attitudism can not take the place of activity. To suppress the
full utterance of the moral convictions of those who so largely
mold the character of the race is a crime against humanity,
against progress, against God.
Mrs. Shattuck, in discussing the question, said:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account