M. Filleul smiled; he was accustomed to differences of opinion and
sight in witnesses to one and the same fact:
“So we have to do, on the one hand, with a man, the one in the drawing
room, who is, at the same time, tall and short, stout and thin, and, on
the other, with two men, those in the park, who are accused of removing
from that drawing room objects—which are still here!”
M. Filleul was a magistrate of the ironic school, as he himself would
say. He was also a very ambitious magistrate and one who did not object
to an audience nor to an occasion to display his tactful resource in
public, as was shown by the increasing number of persons who now
crowded into the room. The journalists had been joined by the farmer
and his son, the gardener and his wife, the indoor servants of the
château and the two cabmen who had driven the flies from Dieppe.
M. Filleul continued:
“There is also the question of agreeing upon the way in which the third
person disappeared. Was this the gun you fired, mademoiselle, and from
this window?”
“Yes. The man reached the tombstone which is almost buried under the
brambles, to the left of the cloisters.”
“But he got up again?”
“Only half. Victor ran down at once to guard the little door and I
followed him, leaving the second footman, Albert, to keep watch here.”
Albert now gave his evidence and the magistrate concluded:
“So, according to you, the wounded man was not able to escape on the
left, because your fellow-servant was watching the door, nor on the
right, because you would have seen him cross the lawn. Logically,
therefore, he is, at the present moment, in the comparatively
restricted space that lies before our eyes.”
“I am sure of it.”
“And you, mademoiselle?”
“Yes.”
“And I, too,” said Victor.
The deputy prosecutor exclaimed, with a leer:
“The field of inquiry is quite narrow. We have only to continue the
search commenced four hours ago.”
“We may be more fortunate.”
M. Filleul took the leather cap from the mantel, examined it and,
beckoning to the sergeant of gendarmes, whispered:
“Sergeant, send one of your men to Dieppe at once. Tell him to go to
Maigret, the hatter, in the Rue de la Barre, and ask M. Maigret to tell
him, if possible, to whom this cap was sold.”
The “field of inquiry,” in the deputy’s phrase, was limited to the
space contained between the house, the lawn on the right and the angle
formed by the left wall and the wall opposite the house, that is to
say, a quadrilateral of about a hundred yards each way, in which the
ruins of Ambrumésy, the famous mediæval monastery, stood out at
intervals.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account