"I was saying," Mrs. Grey went on, "that my little child disobeys
me; I may refuse to punish it under the delusion that I love it too
well, or I may rudely shake or strike it. Both acts would proceed from
selfishness and want of self-discipline. A hasty shake or a hasty blow,
means anger, and does not mean love. It means something un-Christ-like,
and is, therefore, unholy. Now, there is yet a third course before me.
I may refuse to act from impulse, and resolve to act from the principle
of love to the child, not its mere emotion."
"The _principle of love_?" Hatty repeated, in a low voice to herself.
"Yes, my dear. Love, as a principle, can make God its supreme object,
while the emotion is, or appears to be, wanting; and this is true of
all our earthly relations. Now I love my child better than I do myself,
and I am going to hurt myself for its sake. It _must_ learn obedience
for its own sake. Therefore, whenever it opposes its will to mine, some
penalty shall invariably follow."
"What, for instance?" asked Hatty, eagerly.
"Oh, there can be no one rule. The gentler the punishment the better,
if the object desired is gained. We are dealing now with a child under
two years of age. The tender little creature will not need the thunder
of the law. Put it in a corner; seat it in a chair apart from the rest;
it may be safe to shut it up in a closet, but it may not be; it depends
on whether it is of a timid or a courageous character. The point is to
make it aware that it is under law. With some natures this is easily
taught."
"But what of a very willful one?" asked Hatty.
"Such a child will greatly tax parental faith and patience," was the
reply. "But it will yield to wise, unselfish, Christian determination;
and its strong will, once disciplined, may become one of its most
serviceable characteristics."
"Would you use a rod?"
"What, on a little child? No."
"Hatty meant a metaphorical rod, I think," said Belle.
"Yes, I did. I mean should one slap a child's hands?"
"It depends upon the character of the mother, and on that of the
child. There is no one rule for all parties. Children ought not to
need corporeal punishment after they are two or three years old; and
if properly managed, I doubt if they need it at all. But you see, my
dear girls, that before a young father and mother are fit to train
children they must be disciplined themselves. Pain should be inflicted
by them without ill-temper, without hasty impulse, and in tender love.
Children should know that love lies at the bottom of all parental law,
and is its foundation."
"Doesn't it seem strange," asked Hatty, "that God commits children to
such youthful hands? Why, how we blunder our way along! I have always
heard that the eldest child had the hardest time in the family--the
object of all sorts of experiments and mistakes."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account