Connected with this proscenium were the buildings belonging to the
stage; these usually formed a structure several storeys in height, which
enclosed the stage on three sides (compare Fig. 153) in the plan of the
theatre of Dionysus (Fig. 150). The older walls belonging to the fourth
century are sketched more lightly than the later restorations; here the
walls of the stage, the actual _skene_, is the piece marked G. Z.; on
the right and left were side wings (παρασκήνια), and these were
terminated by the walls 12 and 13. The latest investigations of Dörpfeld
prove that the stage of the theatre of Dionysus, constructed by the
orator Lycurgus, had originally no fixed proscenium, but that a fresh
wooden stage was constructed on every occasion. In later times they cut
off a piece of the two side wings and fixed scenery between them.
Several doors led from the tent to the stage; as a rule, there were
three in the background, of which the middle one was the entrance of the
chief actor, called “Protagonist,” and was supposed to lead either from
a royal palace, or a dwelling, or a cave, according to the nature of the
play; the door on the right was for the second actor, the one on the
left had no special significance. We must not, however, regard these
statements as universal. Probably there were usually three entrances to
the stage, though in the theatre of Dionysus there is only a single
door; but as the front was usually covered by some decoration, these
entrances were not directly used, but the actors came through them into
the narrow space between the wall of the stage and the decorations, and
thence through the doors in the decorations on to the stage. The scenery
of the background varied according to the nature of the action, and
sometimes required several doors or entrances; sometimes there may have
been no door at all, since the actors also had at their disposal the
entrances by the side wings. These statements, therefore, only refer to
certain plays, especially those tragedies in which the chief personage
is a king; in this case, probably, the middle door was the one supposed
to lead to the royal palace, and used, therefore, only by the
protagonist, although we must not on that account suppose that he always
came and went through this door, since the nature of the plays would of
itself forbid this. Very often, too, a king appeared in the play whose
part was an unimportant one, not given to the protagonist, and then, of
course, the rule above quoted could not be observed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive