The second kind of decoration, which took the place of our movable
scenes, were the revolving pieces. These were two contrivances shaped
like a three-sided prism, placed on either side of the stage at a little
distance from the side-wings; their axis was attached to the wooden
floor of the stage, and round this they moved. Each of them had three
surfaces for decoration, so that, by turning them round, three different
scenes could be represented, and this was doubtless enough for any play,
for in the pieces which have come down to us there is only change of
scene in two, the “Eumenides” of Aeschylus, and the “Ajax” of Sophocles,
and in both these tragedies there is only one change. These revolving
pieces must also have had a little store of decorations, for it was very
easy to cover them with a change of picture, as they appear to have been
simple stands. The theory that the ancient stage had altogether only
three scenes for these stands--viz., one for tragedy, one for comedy,
and one for the satyric drama, is undoubtedly mistaken.
The Greek stage had no other scenery than that for the background and
the revolving pieces; there must have been some movable properties,
such as benches, altars, tombs, etc., which are indicated by the
contents of many plays preserved to us. It is very doubtful whether the
Greek theatre resembled the Roman in the use of a curtain, which,
instead of drawing up, sank down into the ground when the play opened;
there is no absolute proof that this was the case. The modern prompter’s
box was unknown, and it is evident that they did not make use of a
prompter.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account