was either the himation and chlamys, common in ordinary life, or else
garments peculiar to the stage, of which a number of names have come
down to us, but no exact details of their shape and mode of wearing.
Here, too, colour was the rule; black clothing was worn
[Illustration: FIG. 160.]
by wretched and persecuted people. In their case, of course, the festive
costume, which would have formed too sharp a contrast with their parts,
was discarded; Philoctetes, Telephus, etc., did not appear in royal
splendour, but in simple garments or even in rags. We may remember the
description given in the “Oedipus at Colonus” of the appearance of the
unhappy exiled prince; and Aristophanes’ jokes show us that Euripides
aimed specially at attracting the pity of the spectators by wretched
beggars’ dress. The dress of the women, generally speaking, was similar;
perhaps there was a difference in the mode in which the upper garment
was put on. Subordinate personages in tragedy--messengers, satellites,
slaves, etc.--wore the short chiton; paidogogoi appeared in the barbaric
dress already described; and thus variety in the appearance of the
actors was produced, while the ceremonious dress was reserved for the
most important personages. The ivory statuette of an actor, of which two
sides are represented in Figs. 161 and 162, gives an excellent notion of
the tragic costume. He wears a long chiton, with sleeves (painted blue
in the original) decorated with three broad stripes, descending from the
girdle to his feet, and with horizontal stripes round his sleeves. The
mask, with the high superficies, bears an expression of wild anger; the
size of the slits for the eyes is remarkable, and we can see through
them the eyes of the actor, as well as a piece of the face immediately
round them. As a rule, only the pupil so appears in Greek masks, and
therefore the editor (C. Robert) surmises that this points to a Roman
custom of the Imperial age. This statuette is also interesting for the
shape of the “cothurnus,” the usual foot-gear of the tragic actor. The
cothurnus was a tolerably high shoe, but made to fit either foot;
[Illustration: FIG. 161.]
[Illustration: FIG. 162.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account