the tragic cothurnus was especially distinguished by very high cork
soles, which considerably increased the height of the wearer. As may
here be seen, the foot with the actual cothurnus is hidden under the
dress, only the high soles are visible beneath it. When the height of
the actor was thus increased by the superficies and cothurnus, it was
necessary to give a larger appearance to the rest of the figure; for
this purpose they stuffed themselves out with cushions, and wore gloves
with long fingers, which seem to have been fastened to the sleeves, etc.
The whole produced an effect that would hardly have suited our taste,
but in reality was not nearly so strange as the costume of the heroes of
Corneille and Racine, to whose court dress and long wigs the seventeenth
century seems to have taken no exception. Of course, there were various
necessary additions to this costume: arms for the warriors, a sceptre
for the kings, a lion’s skin and club for Hercules, and a fawn skin for
Artemis, etc. In comedy the women probably appeared in the costume of
ordinary life. For the male characters, except the fantastic parts, the
short chiton seems to have been commonest, especially for persons of the
lower classes; and the slaves, who were never absent from the newer
comedy, wore the “exomis,” the common workman’s dress. The skin garments
of the country people were also worn, and knapsacks and knotty sticks
completed their equipment. In later comedy special characters were
marked out by the colour of the dresses: thus, the parasites wore black
or green dresses; others, again, coloured dresses with cloaks; slaves,
the white exomis; youths, the white chiton with purple border; cooks,
unfulled garments, etc. Similarly the feminine characters were marked
out; there was the old woman, the daughters of citizens, the rich
heiresses, hetaerae, etc. In the comedy of Southern Italy, the costume
of which is represented on many vase paintings, the actors of male parts
usually wear a closely-fitting dress,
[Illustration:
T. II PL XCIV.
FIG. 163.]
covering the legs as far as the ankles, and the arms down to the hand,
and over this a tight-fitting tunic, leaving arms and legs free (compare
Fig. 163). Here it is evident that the lower garment takes the place of
our tricot; the arms and legs are supposed to be bare. If the object was
to represent absolute nudity, the tunic was replaced by a close-fitting
vest, usually provided with a false stuffing, on which the breasts and
navel were marked. To this was sometimes added the comic phallus, a
remnant of the old coarse popular jokes, in which the Older Comedy
frequently indulged. But in the New Comedy it fell gradually into
disuse, and was entirely absent from the representations of ordinary
life, though introduced into farces which burlesqued the myths and tales
of the heroes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account