different material behind, we are reduced to the opinion which, in view
of similar developments in the dress of a later period, is not
improbable--that this upper part was sometimes quite separate from the
chiton, and was put on as a special garment.
[Illustration: FIG. 13.]
With this costume we sometimes find an over garment, which must not,
however, be confused with the himation. This is worn over the chiton,
but fastened in by the girdle also, and is usually open on one side.
(Compare Fig. 15.) This upper garment, which usually is only seen below
the girdle, is sometimes made of the same material as the bib, sometimes
of a different one, but it usually differs in colour and pattern from
the garment worn under it. It is not very evident from the vase pictures
how this was put on, but it seems to have been draped and not sewn, and
worn over the chiton for more elaborate dress, and fastened together
with it by means of the girdle.
[Illustration: FIG. 14.]
With this antique costume the himation was worn as a cloak, which, both
in its shape and in the mode of wearing, corresponded absolutely to the
large himation worn by men; like this, it specially covered the back and
fell over the arms in two points. There is, however, this distinction
between the male and female costume, that the women often drew this
cloak up so high as to cover the back of the head (compare Fig. 1), a
fashion which also continued in later times.
The change which we see gradually produced in this costume on works of
art has been often regarded as a real change in the fashion, but was
probably
[Illustration:
T. III PL. XXXVI D.
FIG. 15.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account