We must now say a few words about the external details of the
performance, the public, and the reception of the pieces. Originally,
admission to theatrical representations was free, as to a religious
festival in which the whole population were to take part. But when the
crowd of spectators became greater this had its disadvantages, and very
often quarrels for places ensued between citizens and strangers. We know
little of the conditions in other places; but at Athens, when in 500
B.C. the old wooden theatre fell down during a performance, and the new
stone theatre of Dionysus was erected, they took advantage of the
occasion to levy an entrance fee, the amount of which is uncertain. Even
at the beginning of the fifth century the income from this source seems
to have belonged to a theatrical lessee, whose duty it was in
consequence to keep the building in proper condition. He paid a fixed
sum to the State, and in return received the entrance money. It is well
known that Pericles, partly with a benevolent desire of making the
theatre accessible for the poorer class of citizens, and partly also in
order to increase his popularity by this democratic measure, introduced
a law by which every citizen received the price of admission from the
State. This was the “show-money” (θεωρικόυ), an institution which seems
to have lasted for centuries, but the arrangements connected with it are
by no means clear. In the first place, it was probably calculated for
the poor people only; but the rich, too, made use of it, if only to
escape from possible reproach of pride or haughtiness by some of the
numerous informers who at that time existed at Athens. There was a
special board entrusted with the distribution; the show-money was
allotted to the citizens according to tribes by cashiers appointed by
lot, whose duty it was to see that none received it without proper
claim. It was therefore distributed in the separate tribes according to
the registers of citizens in the demes. The statements of the ancients
do not agree about the amount of the money; but the most probable of the
newer hypotheses is that for one day it amounted to two obols, for the
three days of the great Dionysia one drachma. The money was paid, on
admission into the theatre, to the lessee, who either received it in
person, or levied it by means of his controllers or cashiers; the same
people took the fees from those who had not received the show-money,
such as the resident foreigners, strangers, etc. It is very difficult to
decide whether this was paid in coin or not; one hypothesis is that,
instead of money, the citizens received tickets, which had the value of
money, and simplified the paying out as well as the paying back; many
such counters bearing theatrical emblems, have come down to us, and are
supposed to have been admission passes. Still, weighty objections have
been made to this hypothesis; and it is more probable that the citizens
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account