The Honorable Peter Stirling and What People Thought of HimFord, Paul Leicester
General
The Honorable Peter Stirling and What People Thought of Him
Ford, Paul Leicester
Labor movement -- Fiction; Love stories; New York (N.Y.) -- Fiction; Political fiction; Tenement houses -- Fiction
Peter drew the Food-Commission report as well, although it went before
the Commission as Green’s. To this, too, a proposed bill was attached,
which had undergone the scrutiny of the Health Board, and had been
conformed to their suggestions.
In November Peter carried both reports to Albany, and had a long talk
with Catlin over them. That official would have preferred no reports,
but since they were made, there was nothing to do but to submit them to
the Legislature. Peter did not get much encouragement from him about
the chances for the bills. But Costell told him that they could be
“whipped through. The only danger is of their being amended, so as to
spoil them.”
“Well,” said Peter, “I hope they will be passed. I’ve done my best,
whatever happens.”
A very satisfactory thing to be able to say of yourself, if you believe
in your own truthfulness.
CHAPTER XXIX.
IN THE MEANTIME.
In spite of nine months’ hard work on the two Commissions, it is not to
be supposed that Peter’s time was thus entirely monopolized. If one
spends but seven hours of the twenty-four in sleep, and but two more on
meals, there is considerable remaining time, and even so slow a worker
as Peter found spare hours not merely for society and saloons, but for
what else he chose to undertake.
Socially he had an evening with Miss De Voe, just before she left the
city for the summer; a dinner with Mr. Pell, who seemed to have taken a
liking to Peter; a call on Lispenard; another on Le Grand; and a family
meal at the Rivingtons, where he was made much of in return for his aid
to Ray.
In the saloons he worked hard over the coming primary, and spent
evenings as well on doorsteps in the district, talking over objects and
candidates. In the same cause, he saw much of Costell, Green,
Gallagher, Schlurger and many other party men of greater or less note
in the city’s politics. He had become a recognized quantity in the
control of the district, and the various ward factions tried hard to
gain his support. When the primary met, the proceedings, if exciting,
were never for a moment doubtful, for Gallagher, Peter, Moriarty and
Blunkers had been able to agree on both programme and candidates. An
attempt had been made to “turn down” Schlurger, but Peter had opposed
it, and had carried his point, to the great gratitude of the silent,
honest German. What was more important to him, this had all been done
without exciting hard feelings.
“Stirling’s a reasonable fellow,” Gallagher told Costell, not knowing
how much Peter was seeing of the big leader, “and he isn’t dead set on
carrying his own schemes. We’ve never had so little talk of mutiny and
sulking as we have had this paring. Moriarty and Blunkers swear by him.
It’s queer. They’ve always been on opposite sides till now.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account