The Honorable Peter Stirling and What People Thought of HimFord, Paul Leicester
General
The Honorable Peter Stirling and What People Thought of Him
Ford, Paul Leicester
Labor movement -- Fiction; Love stories; New York (N.Y.) -- Fiction; Political fiction; Tenement houses -- Fiction
“She was speaking of their plans after returning from the wedding
journey, and she said: ‘I am going to have Peter keep up his bachelor
quarters.’ ‘Does he say he’ll do it?’ I asked. ‘I haven’t spoken to
him,’ she replied, ‘but of course he will.’ I said: ‘Leonore, all women
think they rule their husbands, but they don’t in reality, and Peter
will be less ruled than any man I know.’ Then what do you think she
said?”
“Don’t keep us in suspense.”
“She said: ‘None of you ever understood Peter. But I do.’ Think of it!
From that little chit, who’s known Peter half the number of months that
I’ve known him years!”
“I don’t know,” sighed Lispenard. “I’m not prepared to say it isn’t so.
Indeed, after seeing Peter, who never seemed able to understand women
till this one appeared on the scene, develop into a regulation lover, I
am quite prepared to believe that every one knows more than I do. At
the same time, I can’t afford to risk my reputation for discrimination
and insight over such a simple thing as Peter’s character. You’ve all
tried to say what Peter is. Now I’ll tell you in two words and you’ll
all find you are right, and you’ll all find you are wrong.”
“You are as bad as Leonore,” cried Dorothy.
“Well,” said Watts, “we are all listening. What is Peter?”
“He is an extreme type of a man far from uncommon in this country, yet
who has never been understood by foreigners, and by few Americans.”
“Well?”
“Peter is a practical idealist”
CHAPTER LXI.
LEONORE’S THEORY.
And how well had that “talk-it-over” group at the end of Peters
wedding-day grasped his character? How clearly do we ever gain an
insight into the feelings and motives which induce conduct even in
those whom we best know and love? Each had found something in Peter
that no other had discovered. We speak of rose-colored glasses, and
Shakespeare wrote, “All things are yellow to a jaundiced eye.” When we
take a bit of blue glass, and place it with yellow, it becomes green.
When we put it with red, it becomes purple. Yet blue it is all the
time. Is not each person responsible for the tint he seems to produce
in others? Can we ever learn that the thing is blue, and that the green
or purple aspect is only the tinge which we ourselves help to give? Can
we ever learn that we love and are loved entirely as we give ourselves
colors which may harmonize with those about us? That love, wins love;
kindness, kindness; hate, hate. That just such elements as we give to
the individual, the individual gives back to us? That the sides we show
are the sides seen by the world. There were people who could truly
believe that Peter was a ward boss; a frequenter of saloons; a
drunkard; a liar; a swearer; a murderer, in intention, if not in act; a
profligate; and a compromiser of many of his own strongest principles.
Yet there were people who could, say other things of him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account