The Honorable Peter Stirling and What People Thought of HimFord, Paul Leicester
General
The Honorable Peter Stirling and What People Thought of Him
Ford, Paul Leicester
Labor movement -- Fiction; Love stories; New York (N.Y.) -- Fiction; Political fiction; Tenement houses -- Fiction
Steele once wrote that the only difference between the Catholic Church
and the Church of England was, that the former was infallible and the
latter never wrong. Mr. Pierce would hardly have claimed for himself
either of these qualities. He was too accustomed in his business to
writing, “E. and O.E.” above his initials, to put much faith in human
dicta. But in the present instance he felt sure of what he said, and
the little group clearly agreed. If they were right, this story is like
that recounted in Mother Goose, which was ended before it was begun.
But Mr. Pierce had said that romance is everywhere to those who have
the spirit of it in them. Perhaps in this case the spirit was lacking
in his judges—not in Peter Stirling.
CHAPTER II.
APPEARANCES.
The unconscious illustration of Mr. Pierce’s theory was pacing
backwards and forwards on the narrow space between the cuddy-roof and
the gunwale, which custom dignifies with the name of deck. Six strides
forward and turn. Six strides aft and turn. That was the extent of the
beat. Yet had Peter been on sentry duty, he could not have continued it
more regularly or persistently. If he were walking off his supper, as
most of those seated aft would have suggested, the performance was not
particularly interesting. The limit and rapidity of the walk resembled
the tramp of a confined animal, exercising its last meal. But when one
stands in front of the lion’s cage, and sees that restless and tireless
stride, one cannot but wonder how much of it is due to the last
shin-bone, and how much to the wild and powerful nature under the tawny
skin. The question occurs because the nature and antecedents of the
lion are known. For this same reason the yachters were a unit in
agreeing that Stirling’s unceasing walk was merely a digestive
promenade. The problem was whether they were right? Or whether, to
apply Mr. Pierce’s formula, they merely imposed their own frame of mind
in place of Stirling’s, and decided, since their sole reason for
walking at the moment would be entirely hygienic, that he too must be
striding from the same cause?
Dr. Holmes tells us that when James and Thomas converse there are
really six talkers. First, James as James thinks he is, and Thomas as
Thomas thinks he is. Second James as Thomas thinks him, and Thomas as
James thinks him. Finally, there are James and Thomas as they really
are. Since this is neither an autobiography nor an inspired story, the
world’s view of Peter Stirling must be adopted without regard to its
accuracy. And because this view was the sum of his past and personal,
these elements must be computed before we can know on what the world
based its conclusions concerning him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account