The Horse and His Rider: Or, Sketches and Anecdotes of the Noble Quadruped, and of Equestrian NationsSpringfield, Rollo
History
The Horse and His Rider: Or, Sketches and Anecdotes of the Noble Quadruped, and of Equestrian Nations
Springfield, Rollo
Horsemen and horsewomen; Horses; Horses -- Anecdotes
Neither sacred nor profane history informs us in what country the horse
was first domesticated, or whether he was first used for draught or
riding. It is probable that the animal was employed for both purposes in
very early times, and in various parts of the world; but though many of
the ancients possessed great mastery over their horses, and performed
with them admirable feats of skill and agility, it is nevertheless
surprising by what slow steps the arts and inventions, connected with
horsemanship, have reached their present degree of perfection. The
polished Greeks, as well as the ruder nations of northern Africa, for a
long while rode without either saddle or bridle, guiding their horses
with the voice or the hand, or with a light switch. They touched the
animal on the right or left of the face to make him turn in the opposite
direction; they stopped him by touching his muzzle, and urged him
forward with the heel. The horses must have been excellently trained, to
be governed by such slight means, in the violence of their course, or in
the tumult of battle; but the attention, docility, and memory of this
animal are such, that it is hard to say to what a degree of obedience he
may not be brought.
Bridles and bits were at length introduced; but many centuries elapsed
before any thing that can properly be called a saddle was used. Instead
of these, cloths, single or padded, and skins of wild beasts, often
richly adorned, were placed beneath the rider, but always without
stirrups. It is a very extraordinary fact that even the Romans, in the
times when luxury was carried to the utmost excess amongst them, never
devised so simple an expedient for assisting the horseman to mount,
lessening his fatigue, and securing his seat, although painful diseases
were not infrequently eased by the habit of riding with the feet
unsupported. Many ancient sculptures prove that the horsemen of almost
every country used to mount on the right side of the animal, in order
the better to grasp the mane which hangs on that side. The practice is
invariably reversed in modern days, and none but a Billy Button would
think of mounting on the _off_ side, notwithstanding the classical
authority that may be alleged for so doing.
The ancient heroes generally leaped on their horses’ backs; or their
spear, if they carried one, had a loop, or projection, about two feet
from the bottom, which served them as a step. The horse was sometimes
trained to lower his neck and back, or to kneel down for his rider; and
both in Greece and Rome the local magistracy were bound to see that
blocks, for mounting from (what the Scotch call _loupin-on stanes_),
were placed along the roads at convenient distances. The great, however,
thought it more dignified to use living blocks, and to climb into their
seats, by setting their feet on the bent backs of their slaves; and many
who could not command such costly help used to carry a light ladder
about with them—a curious piece of horse furniture!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account