The Horse of America in His Derivation, History, and DevelopmentWallace, John Hankins
History
The Horse of America in His Derivation, History, and Development
Wallace, John Hankins
Horse breeds -- History; Horses -- Breeding -- United States; Horses -- United States -- History
NEW JERSEY is not known to have made any direct importations of horses
from the old country. Lying between New York on the east and Pennsylvania
on the west, she had abundant opportunity to get her supply of horses
from her neighbors on either side, to say nothing of the overflow from
Virginia about 1669. Like all the other colonies, as early as 1668 her
horses were ordered to be branded and then suffered to roam at large and
find their own living. Not much attention seems to have been given to the
idea of improvement in the size and quality of the stock till 1731, when
it was provided by law that all colts of eighteen months old, running at
large and under fourteen hands high, should be gelded. I have not made
any attempt to get at the exact average size of the Jersey horses, nor to
ascertain the ratio of pacers among them, for we know the environments
and the sources of supply, and in knowing these we know just what the
Jersey horses were—a large majority of them were pacers and they were not
over fourteen hands high.
The statutes of this colony, enacted 1748, furnished the first real
evidence of record, with one exception, going to show that pacing and
trotting races, as well as running races, were the common amusement of
the people in the first half of the last century. They were so common,
indeed, that the legislative authorities declared them a nuisance
and restricted them to certain days in the year. That this was not a
“moral spasm,” as some might call it, that had seized the legislative
authorities of that particular year, is evident from the fact that,
afterward and from time to time, this statute was amended, and always
in the direction of greater restrictions and greater severity. This is
sufficient evidence that the moral sense of the community sustained the
lawmakers in pronouncing it a nuisance, to be abated. It is not probable
that pacing and trotting races were any more common or more demoralizing
in New Jersey than in some of the other colonies, but they seem to have
been content with fulminating against “horse racing” without specifying
the different gaits at which the horses might go in the race. Until this
old colonial statute was discovered, it was not possible to prove by
contemporaneous evidence that there had been any pacing or trotting races
before the first decade of the present century. This, however, adds to
their antiquity more than a hundred years.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account