The Horse of America in His Derivation, History, and DevelopmentWallace, John Hankins
History
The Horse of America in His Derivation, History, and Development
Wallace, John Hankins
Horse breeds -- History; Horses -- Breeding -- United States; Horses -- United States -- History
indorsement of the honesty of the “slick and experienced” dealers as
honest men and true descendants of the Bedouins of the desert. In this
“he doth protest too much” and thus suggests that while the pedigrees
came from the tribes of the desert to the South, it might be possible
that the horses came from the farmers who bred them to the North. However
this may have been, the whole enterprise turned out to be a flat failure,
and after a number of years spent in begging for popular support, the
whole collection was dispersed under the hammer of the auctioneer, not
realizing a tithing of the cost.
While it is not necessary that I should express any opinion as to whether
Mr. Blunt was deceived in the breeding of the animals which he brought
home, I will make brief allusion to an American experience which is more
fully considered elsewhere. Some forty or more years ago Mr. A. Keene
Richards, a breeder of race horses in Kentucky, became impressed with the
idea that the way to improve the race horse of America was to introduce
direct infusions of the blood of Arabia. He did not hesitate, but he
started to Arabia and brought home some horses and mares and put them to
breeding. The pure bloods could not run at all and the half-breeds were
too slow to make the semblance of a contest with Kentucky-bred colts. He
concluded that he had been cheated by the rascally Arabs in the blood
they put upon him. He then determined to go back and get the right blood,
and as a counselor he took with him the famous horse painter, Troye, who
was thoroughly up on anatomy and structure. They went into the very heart
of Arabia and spent many weeks among the different tribes of the desert.
They had greatly the advantage of Mr. Blunt or any other amateur, for
they were experienced horsemen and knew just what they were doing. When
they were ready to start home they believed they had found and secured
the very best horses that Arabia had produced. When the produce of this
second importation were old enough to run it was found that they were no
better than the first lot, and thus all the bright dreams of enthusiasm
were dissipated. Thus was demonstrated for the thousandth time that the
blood of even the best and purest Arabian horse is a detriment and
hindrance rather than a benefit to the modern race horse. Mr. Richards,
with all his practical knowledge and experience, was no more successful
than the amateur, Mr. Blunt. The blood which Mr. Richards brought
home was, no doubt, purer and more fashionable, as estimated in the
desert, than that brought home by Mr. Blunt, but when tested by modern
advancement it was no better.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account