The Horse of America in His Derivation, History, and DevelopmentWallace, John Hankins
History
The Horse of America in His Derivation, History, and Development
Wallace, John Hankins
Horse breeds -- History; Horses -- Breeding -- United States; Horses -- United States -- History
The colonial horses of Virginia were of all colors and all very small
in size, as we would class them in our day. An examination of a great
many advertisements of “Strayed,” “Taken up,” etc., of the period of
about 1750, clearly establishes the fact that at that time the average
height was a small fraction over thirteen hands and one inch. More were
described as just thirteen hands than any other size, and they were
nearly all between thirteen and fourteen. From this same advertising
source I was able to glean conclusive evidence as to their habits of
action, and found that just two-thirds of them were natural pacers and
one-third natural trotters. Thus for more than a hundred years they
had retained the peculiarities of their English ancestors in the reign
of James I., in color, size, and gait. This in no way differs from the
description of the Chincoteague Island ponies of to-day. As early as 1686
a law was enacted that all stallions less than thirteen and a half hands
high found running at large should be forfeited; but this, like Henry
VIII.’s laws in the same direction, had failed to increase the average
size of the horses. From the indomitable passion for horse-racing which
prevailed universally among the colonists, we may safely conclude that
some animals were carefully selected and coupled with a view to the speed
of the progeny, both at the gallop and at the pace, but the great mass
were allowed to roam at large, and under such conditions no variety or
tribe of horses has ever improved in size, or indeed in any other quality.
The early horses of the Dutch colony of New Netherlands, afterward New
York, were brought from Utrecht in Holland. As we would look at them
to-day, they were small, but they were larger and better, and brought
higher prices than the English horses of the Eastern colonies or than
the Swedish on the West. It was conceded, however, that for the saddle
they were not so good as the New England horses, and hence it may be
inferred that they were not pacers. It is very evident, however, that the
two breeds were soon mixed, as the saddle was then the universal means
of travel, whether for long or short distances. During the time of the
Revolutionary war a large accumulation of data bearing on the size and
action of the horses of that period goes to show that the average size
had then increased to fourteen hands and one inch, and in gait fifteen
both paced and trotted, nine trotted only, and seven paced only. It is
not pretended that these data represent the horses of the early colonial
period, but only of the period above indicated. Strains of larger breeds
had been introduced, but the little New England pacer had made his mark
on the habits of action.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account