The Hospital Bulletin, Vol. V, No. 2, April 15, 1909Various
Philosophy
The Hospital Bulletin, Vol. V, No. 2, April 15, 1909
Various
Medical colleges -- Alumni and alumnae -- Maryland -- Baltimore -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals
I said that there was often doubt as to the condition in the abdomen in
these cases. Now, there can be no doubt that the two main points in the
diagnosis of a localized abscess are tumor and an aggravation of the
symptoms present. But this case exemplified the fact that there may be
cases where there is no aggravation of symptoms, and in a great many
cases it may be impossible to feel the tumor until it has become very
large, owing to its situation, viz., post caecal. Even in this case,
from which a great quantity of pus was evacuated, there was no absolute
certainty of finding pus on opening the abdomen, although it was
suspected strongly.
I have seen a patient walk into the hospital on Sunday with a
temperature of 100 and a pulse of 99, and when the abdomen was opened on
Monday morning a most virulent form of general streptococcus peritonitis
was found, from which the patient died the next day. It is said that it
is much better to depend on the pulse and its variations than on the
temperature.
I would like to call attention to several points in the treatment of
this case also.
First, the place of incision was, as I said, well up towards the iliac
crest, and not in the time-honored McBurney point. The wisdom of this is
self-evident.
Second, the care used in not breaking up the wall of the abscess formed
by the peritoneum.
Also, the fact that the appendix was carefully dissected up and tied off
and allowed to heal by itself, obviating, as much as possible, the
danger of a faecal fistula. The older books advised evacuating the
abscess and leaving the appendix to slough off, and, while I have seen
seven cases where this method was used and not a single faecal fistula,
yet it seems to me the more rational treatment to remove the offender,
as I have also assisted in three operations where the appendix was
removed at the second operation. That is, an operation supposedly an
appendectomy was done, and later, at a subsequent period, the diseased
appendix was found still causing the same old trouble.
Again, the use of the lumbar puncture, so as to drain the abscess cavity
from its very bottom. I wonder this is not done oftener, as it appeals
to me as being a most sensible thing.
Then the abscess cavity was sponged out with gauze, and not washed out
with the antiseptic fluid that books advise, thus spreading bacteria all
over the peritoneal cavity, and really doing no good. Nature was allowed
to throw off such things as she deemed necessary, an avenue of escape
having been provided.
And, lastly, the omentum was found and brought down, covering in the
cavity as much as possible, and thus aiding in the walling off process.
DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY.
BY RICHARD H. JOHNSTON, M. D.
_Read Before the Baltimore City Medical Society,
Section on Medicine and Surgery,
February, 1909._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account