They do not answer “home”; nor do they even say “to our house.” They
say “_the house_.” It may be a wretched, tumble-down shed: all the
same it is the house, the only house in all the world. Some day there
will be others,--perhaps. But that is not so certain, after all.
Even young men and women, and quite grown persons, married folk, if
you please, use the same expression. _At the house_ they used to
do this, _at the house_ there was that. One might suppose they
were speaking of their present house. Not at all; they are speaking of
the house of their childhood, the house where their father and mother
lived, and which they have not been able to keep, or the customs of
which they have changed--it’s all one--but which in their memory is
always the same. You quite understand that there cannot be two.
I was a school-boy then; oh, just a little primary school child,
perhaps seven or eight years old,--seven or eight I think. I always
said “the house” just as people say _la patrie_ when they mean
France. Still, I knew very well that there were people who called it by
other names, names which sound grander to a child. The baby’s Italian
nurse used to call it _il palazzo_, rounding her mouth for the
second _a_, and letting the last syllable die gently away in a
lingering whisper. The farmer who brought the rent, or more probably an
instalment of it, or even a fowl of some sort, to encourage the master
to have patience, would say _the château_, with several circumflex
accents. A lady who came from Paris to visit us--you would know she
was from Paris by the lorgnette which she carried--had given it the
dignified title _your mansion_. And during the crisis of which I
shall have presently to tell, any one might read on the humiliating
bill that was posted on our front gate the words _Villa for sale_.
Villa, mansion, château, palace, how colourless are all these majestic
words, notwithstanding their fine sound! What was the use of tangling
up the truth in words? “The house” is quite enough. “The house” tells
the whole story.
It is still there: it has an ancient habit of being there. You would
have no trouble in finding it--the whole country knows the Rambert
house, because our family has always lived in it. It has been carefully
repaired--too carefully, indeed--from garret to cellar, furbished and
decorated, repainted and polished outside and in. Of course it will not
do to let houses go on forever wearing themselves out, and a decaying
homestead has poetic charm only to passing travellers. Every-day life
has its indispensabilities. But nobody cares that one’s house should be
new any more than that one’s parents should be young. If they are young
they are less entirely ours. They feel a right to an existence of their
own, whereas later, our life is their life, and that is all that we ask
of them, for we are not exacting.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account